TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects of Increased Protein Intake on Fullness
T2 - A Meta-Analysis and Its Limitations
AU - Dhillon, Jaapna
AU - Craig, Bruce A.
AU - Leidy, Heather J.
AU - Amankwaah, Akua F.
AU - Osei-Boadi Anguah, Katherene
AU - Jacobs, Ashley
AU - Jones, Blake L.
AU - Jones, Joshua B.
AU - Keeler, Chelsey L.
AU - Keller, Christine E.M.
AU - McCrory, Megan A.
AU - Rivera, Rebecca L.
AU - Slebodnik, Maribeth
AU - Mattes, Richard D.
AU - Tucker, Robin M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Background: Higher protein intake has been implicated in weight management because of its appetitive properties. However, the effects of protein intake on appetitive sensations such as fullness have not been systematically assessed. Meta-analysis is a useful technique to evaluate evidence of an intervention's effect on testable outcomes, but it also has important limitations. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on the effect of protein intake on fullness using a quantitative meta-analysis and a secondary directional analysis using the vote-counting procedure. A tertiary aim was to address limitations of meta-analyses as they pertain to findings from this meta-analysis. Design: We searched multiple databases for interventional studies that evaluated the effect of increased protein intake on fullness ratings. Inclusion criteria for both analyses were as follows: healthy human participants, preload studies that utilized intact dietary protein, delivery of protein load orally, and studies reporting fullness as an outcome. For the meta-analysis, an additional criterion was that the studies also needed to report 2- to 4-hour area under the curve value for fullness. Results: Five studies met all criteria for the meta-analysis. Twenty-eight studies met all criteria for the directional analysis. The meta-analysis indicated higher protein preloads have a greater effect on fullness than lower protein preloads (overall effect estimate: 2,435.74 mm.240 min, (95% CI 1,375.18 to 3,496.31 mm.240 min; P<0.0001). The directional analysis also revealed a positive effect on fullness with higher protein preloads (P<0.01). Many related scientifically rigorous studies were excluded from the analysis because analytical criteria required a narrowly focused research question. Conclusions: The present analyses show that higher protein preloads increase fullness ratings more than lower protein preloads under tightly defined conditions. Extrapolation of findings to common conditions outside the specified criteria of this analysis must be made cautiously, as must speculation about the influence of fullness sensations on ingestive behavior, body weight, and various health outcomes.
AB - Background: Higher protein intake has been implicated in weight management because of its appetitive properties. However, the effects of protein intake on appetitive sensations such as fullness have not been systematically assessed. Meta-analysis is a useful technique to evaluate evidence of an intervention's effect on testable outcomes, but it also has important limitations. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on the effect of protein intake on fullness using a quantitative meta-analysis and a secondary directional analysis using the vote-counting procedure. A tertiary aim was to address limitations of meta-analyses as they pertain to findings from this meta-analysis. Design: We searched multiple databases for interventional studies that evaluated the effect of increased protein intake on fullness ratings. Inclusion criteria for both analyses were as follows: healthy human participants, preload studies that utilized intact dietary protein, delivery of protein load orally, and studies reporting fullness as an outcome. For the meta-analysis, an additional criterion was that the studies also needed to report 2- to 4-hour area under the curve value for fullness. Results: Five studies met all criteria for the meta-analysis. Twenty-eight studies met all criteria for the directional analysis. The meta-analysis indicated higher protein preloads have a greater effect on fullness than lower protein preloads (overall effect estimate: 2,435.74 mm.240 min, (95% CI 1,375.18 to 3,496.31 mm.240 min; P<0.0001). The directional analysis also revealed a positive effect on fullness with higher protein preloads (P<0.01). Many related scientifically rigorous studies were excluded from the analysis because analytical criteria required a narrowly focused research question. Conclusions: The present analyses show that higher protein preloads increase fullness ratings more than lower protein preloads under tightly defined conditions. Extrapolation of findings to common conditions outside the specified criteria of this analysis must be made cautiously, as must speculation about the influence of fullness sensations on ingestive behavior, body weight, and various health outcomes.
KW - Appetitive sensations
KW - Dietary protein
KW - Fullness
KW - Human preload studies
KW - Meta-analysis limitations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959268254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959268254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2016.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2016.01.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 26947338
AN - SCOPUS:84959268254
SN - 2212-2672
VL - 116
SP - 968
EP - 983
JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
IS - 6
ER -