Abstract
Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range (Target: 100% to 97%; Low: 96% to 90%; Critical: 89% and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95])%, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100])%; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95])%, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]%; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 565-572 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Anaesthesia |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2016 |
Keywords
- auditory alarms
- auditory displays
- patient monitoring
- pulse oximetry
- sonification
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine