Abstract
As audits of public companies are labor intensive, require a variety of team members, and involve yearround work, practitioners and academics have increasingly focused on identifying audit production factors that drive audit quality. Using proprietary data, we analyze the cost-benefit tradeoffs of two audit production characteristics, client expertise and the relative amount of auditing done during the early phases of the audit, and find that both are associated with more effective audits and higher fees. We analyze whether the influence of these characteristics varies across audit team members. We find that middle manager production characteristics explain audit effectiveness and higher fees and relatively more so than those of lead/review partners. These results extend the literature and practitioner discussions about drivers of audit quality by highlighting the importance of middle management, which, to our knowledge, has largely been overlooked by the archival audit literature and regulatory guidance on audit quality indicators.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-29 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Accounting Review |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- and directors
- audit fees
- audit managers
- audit partners
- audit phases
- audit production
- audit quality
- client expertise
- human capital
- middle managers
- senior managers
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics