TY - JOUR
T1 - The distribution of satellites around massive galaxies at 1 < z < 3 in zfourge/candels
T2 - Dependence on star formation activity
AU - Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee
AU - Papovich, Casey
AU - Quadri, Ryan F.
AU - Tran, Kim Vy H.
AU - Spitler, Lee R.
AU - Kacprzak, Glenn G.
AU - Labbé, Ivo
AU - Straatman, Caroline M.S.
AU - Glazebrook, Karl
AU - Allen, Rebecca
AU - Cowley, Michael
AU - Davé, Romeel
AU - Dekel, Avishai
AU - Ferguson, Henry C.
AU - Hartley, W. G.
AU - Koekemoer, Anton M.
AU - Koo, David C.
AU - Lu, Yu
AU - Mehrtens, Nicola
AU - Nanayakkara, Themiya
AU - Persson, S. Eric
AU - Rees, Glen
AU - Salmon, Brett
AU - Tilvi, Vithal
AU - Tomczak, Adam R.
AU - Van Dokkum, Pieter
PY - 2014/9/10
Y1 - 2014/9/10
N2 - We study the statistical distribution of satellites around star-forming and quiescent central galaxies at 1 < z < 3 using imaging from the FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey and the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey. The deep near-IR data select satellites down to log (M/M) > 9 at z < 3. The radial satellite distribution around centrals is consistent with a projected Navarro-Frenk-White profile. Massive quiescent centrals, log (M/M) > 10.78, have ∼2 times the number of satellites compared to star-forming centrals with a significance of 2.7σ even after accounting for differences in the centrals' stellar-mass distributions. We find no statistical difference in the satellite distributions of intermediate-mass quiescent and star-forming centrals, 10.48 < log (M/M) < 10.78. Compared to the Guo et al. semi-analytic model, the excess number of satellites indicates that quiescent centrals have halo masses 0.3 dex larger than star-forming centrals, even when the stellar-mass distributions are fixed. We use a simple toy model that relates halo mass and quenching, which roughly reproduces the observed quenched fractions and the differences in halo mass between star-forming and quenched galaxies only if galaxies have a quenching probability that increases with halo mass from ∼0 for log (Mh/M) ∼ 11 to ∼1 for log (M h/M) ∼ 13.5. A single halo-mass quenching threshold is unable to reproduce the quiescent fraction and satellite distribution of centrals. Therefore, while halo quenching may be an important mechanism, it is unlikely to be the only factor driving quenching. It remains unclear why a high fraction of centrals remain star-forming even in relatively massive halos.
AB - We study the statistical distribution of satellites around star-forming and quiescent central galaxies at 1 < z < 3 using imaging from the FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey and the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey. The deep near-IR data select satellites down to log (M/M) > 9 at z < 3. The radial satellite distribution around centrals is consistent with a projected Navarro-Frenk-White profile. Massive quiescent centrals, log (M/M) > 10.78, have ∼2 times the number of satellites compared to star-forming centrals with a significance of 2.7σ even after accounting for differences in the centrals' stellar-mass distributions. We find no statistical difference in the satellite distributions of intermediate-mass quiescent and star-forming centrals, 10.48 < log (M/M) < 10.78. Compared to the Guo et al. semi-analytic model, the excess number of satellites indicates that quiescent centrals have halo masses 0.3 dex larger than star-forming centrals, even when the stellar-mass distributions are fixed. We use a simple toy model that relates halo mass and quenching, which roughly reproduces the observed quenched fractions and the differences in halo mass between star-forming and quenched galaxies only if galaxies have a quenching probability that increases with halo mass from ∼0 for log (Mh/M) ∼ 11 to ∼1 for log (M h/M) ∼ 13.5. A single halo-mass quenching threshold is unable to reproduce the quiescent fraction and satellite distribution of centrals. Therefore, while halo quenching may be an important mechanism, it is unlikely to be the only factor driving quenching. It remains unclear why a high fraction of centrals remain star-forming even in relatively massive halos.
KW - galaxies: evolution
KW - galaxies: halos
KW - galaxies: high-redshift
KW - galaxies: statistics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906763636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906763636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/103
DO - 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/103
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84906763636
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 792
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 103
ER -