TY - JOUR
T1 - The demographic consequences of mutualism
T2 - ants increase host-plant fruit production but not population growth
AU - Ford, Kevin R.
AU - Ness, Joshua H.
AU - Bronstein, Judith L.
AU - Morris, William F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA).
PY - 2015/10/22
Y1 - 2015/10/22
N2 - The impact of mutualists on a partner’s demography depends on how they affect the partner’s multiple vital rates and how those vital rates, in turn, affect population growth. However, mutualism studies rarely measure effects on multiple vital rates or integrate them to assess the ultimate impact on population growth. We used vital rate data, population models and simulations of long-term population dynamics to quantify the demographic impact of a guild of ant species on the plant Ferocactus wislizeni. The ants feed at the plant’s extrafloral nectaries and attack herbivores attempting to consume reproductive organs. Ant-guarded plants produced significantly more fruit, but ants had no significant effect on individual growth or survival. After integrating ant effects across these vital rates, we found that projected population growth was not significantly different between unguarded and ant-guarded plants because population growth was only weakly influenced by differences in fruit production (though strongly influenced by differences in individual growth and survival). However, simulations showed that ants could positively affect long-term plant population dynamics through services provided during rare but important events (herbivore outbreaks that reduce survival or years of high seedling recruitment associated with abundant precipitation). Thus, in this seemingly clear example of mutualism, the interaction may actually yield no clear benefit to plant population growth, or if it does, may only do so through the actions of the ants during rare events. These insights demonstrate the value of taking a demographic approach to studying the consequences of mutualism.
AB - The impact of mutualists on a partner’s demography depends on how they affect the partner’s multiple vital rates and how those vital rates, in turn, affect population growth. However, mutualism studies rarely measure effects on multiple vital rates or integrate them to assess the ultimate impact on population growth. We used vital rate data, population models and simulations of long-term population dynamics to quantify the demographic impact of a guild of ant species on the plant Ferocactus wislizeni. The ants feed at the plant’s extrafloral nectaries and attack herbivores attempting to consume reproductive organs. Ant-guarded plants produced significantly more fruit, but ants had no significant effect on individual growth or survival. After integrating ant effects across these vital rates, we found that projected population growth was not significantly different between unguarded and ant-guarded plants because population growth was only weakly influenced by differences in fruit production (though strongly influenced by differences in individual growth and survival). However, simulations showed that ants could positively affect long-term plant population dynamics through services provided during rare but important events (herbivore outbreaks that reduce survival or years of high seedling recruitment associated with abundant precipitation). Thus, in this seemingly clear example of mutualism, the interaction may actually yield no clear benefit to plant population growth, or if it does, may only do so through the actions of the ants during rare events. These insights demonstrate the value of taking a demographic approach to studying the consequences of mutualism.
KW - Ant plant
KW - Cactus demography
KW - Integral projection model
KW - Protection mutualism
KW - Sonoran Desert
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941873806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941873806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00442-015-3341-3
DO - 10.1007/s00442-015-3341-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 26003308
AN - SCOPUS:84941873806
SN - 0029-8549
VL - 179
SP - 435
EP - 446
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 2
ER -