The controversy over retrospective moral judgment

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The mandate of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments required that the Committee take a position on the validity of retrospective moral judgments. However, throughout its period of operation, the Committee remained divided on the question of whether sound judgments of individual culpability and wrongdoing should be included in its Final Report. This essay examines the arguments that various committee members marshalled to support their opposing views on retrospective moral judgment and explains the significance of the controversy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHuman Experimentation and Research
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages117-122
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781315198231
ISBN (Print)9781138709607
StatePublished - Jul 12 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The controversy over retrospective moral judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this