Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The construct and concurrent validity of brief standing sway assessments in children with and without cerebral palsy

  • James B. Tracy
  • , Drew A. Petersen
  • , Benjamin C. Conner
  • , Justus G. Matteson
  • , De'Shjuan G. Triplett
  • , Henry G. Wright
  • , Christopher M. Modlesky
  • , Freeman Miller
  • , Curtis L. Johnson
  • , Jeremy R. Crenshaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Standing postural sway is often quantified from center of pressure trajectories. During assessments of longer durations, children may fidget, thus limiting the feasibility and validity of sway recordings. Research question: Do postural sway sample durations less than 30 s maintain construct and concurrent validity? Methods: In this case-control, observational study, we measured postural sway in 41 children (age 5–12 years, 23 typically developing (TD); 18 with spastic cerebral palsy (CP), 13 diplegic and 5 hemiplegic, 11 GMFCS level I and 7 level II) for 30-second eyes-opened and eyes-closed conditions. From a single recording, 5-second incremental durations of 5−30 s were considered in this analysis. We quantified anteroposterior, mediolateral, and transverse-plane sway using seven time-domain variables: root-mean-square error, total excursion, mean frequency, mean distance, sway area, and 95 % confidence circle and ellipse areas. Variables were calculated in eyes-opened and eyes-closed conditions, as well as the ratio of the two. Construct validity was evaluated by the persistence of large effect sizes (Glass's Δ ≥ 0.80) between CP and TD participants at shorter durations than 30 s. Concurrent validity was evaluated by the correlations of shorter duration measures to the 30 s measure. Results: Seven sway measures had large between-group effects (Glass's Δ ≥ 1.02) for the 30 s measure that persisted (Glass's Δ ≥ 0.81) at shorter durations (5−25 s) and also maintained concurrent validity (r ≥ 0.83). Six of these seven measures were taken in the eyes-closed condition, and all seven measures were in the mediolateral direction or transverse plane. Significance: Our analysis suggests that sway durations less than 30 s can uphold construct and concurrent validity. These measures were primarily in the eyes-closed conditions and mediolateral direction. These results are a promising indicator that shorter-duration sway measures may be of utility when fidgeting prevents longer recordings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-299
Number of pages7
JournalGait and Posture
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Center of pressure
  • Fidgeting
  • Postural control
  • Stability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The construct and concurrent validity of brief standing sway assessments in children with and without cerebral palsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this