Abstract
It is well established that discussion networks have meaningful consequences for a variety of sociopolitical attitudes and behavior. In this project, we explore how social structure shapes reactions to disaster; in particular, the 2010 BP oil spill. We address the questions of how networks are relied upon following community-wide disaster, and to what extent these networks mirror social structures in other domains. To examine these questions, we analyze data that experimentally vary the commonly employed discussion “name-generator” questions to see if oil spill discussants are fundamentally different from important matters discussants. Relative to “important matters” discussants, we find strong support for a specialist model in response to disaster; oil spill discussants tend to be less intimate, more knowledgeable, more active, and more talkative about the oil spill. Ultimately, this suggests a contextual basis for the formation of and reliance on discussion networks.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 566-583 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Social Science Quarterly |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Characteristics of Interpersonal Networks in Disaster Response*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS