The ames test: The two-fold rule revisited

  • Neal F. Cariello
  • , Walter W. Piegorsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Mutagenicity in the Ames assay is evaluated by comparing the number of revertants observed in treated cultures to those in untreated cultures. Often, some form of the '2-fold rule' is employed, whereby a compound is judged mutagenic if a 2-fold or greater increase is seen in a treated culture. In order to understand the underpinnings of this approach, we study some of its statistical properties. We assume that the number of revertants on any plate from a given two-group experiment follows a Poisson distribution and we address the following questions: (1) what is the false-positive error probability of observing at least a doubling of the number of colonies from the control to the treatment group?; (2) if a given mean number of colonies is postulated for a control group, what number of colonies above the observed control mean provides a false-positive rate of 5%? We also present results for question 1 in the case where the number of revertants follows a negative binomial distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-31
Number of pages9
JournalMutation Research - Genetic Toxicology
Volume369
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 10 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ames
  • Background
  • Bacterial
  • False-positive error
  • Mutation
  • Negative binomial distribution
  • Poisson distribution
  • Spontaneous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ames test: The two-fold rule revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this