TY - JOUR
T1 - The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity
T2 - An empirical test in the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study
AU - Ellis, Bruce J
AU - Oldehinkel, Albertine J.
AU - Nederhof, Esther
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2016.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - The adaptive calibration model (ACM) is a theory of developmental programing focusing on calibration of stress response systems and associated life history strategies to local environmental conditions. In this article, we tested some key predictions of the ACM in a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescent males (11-16 years old; N = 351). Measures of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and adrenocortical activation, reactivity to, and recovery from social-evaluative stress validated the four-pattern taxonomy of the ACM via latent profile analysis, though with some deviations from expected patterns. The physiological profiles generally showed predicted associations with antecedent measures of familial and ecological conditions and life stress; as expected, high- and low-responsivity patterns were found under both low-stress and high-stress family conditions. The four patterns were also differentially associated with aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and withdrawn/depressed behavior. This study provides measured support for key predictions of the ACM and highlights important empirical issues and methodological challenges for future research.
AB - The adaptive calibration model (ACM) is a theory of developmental programing focusing on calibration of stress response systems and associated life history strategies to local environmental conditions. In this article, we tested some key predictions of the ACM in a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescent males (11-16 years old; N = 351). Measures of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and adrenocortical activation, reactivity to, and recovery from social-evaluative stress validated the four-pattern taxonomy of the ACM via latent profile analysis, though with some deviations from expected patterns. The physiological profiles generally showed predicted associations with antecedent measures of familial and ecological conditions and life stress; as expected, high- and low-responsivity patterns were found under both low-stress and high-stress family conditions. The four patterns were also differentially associated with aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and withdrawn/depressed behavior. This study provides measured support for key predictions of the ACM and highlights important empirical issues and methodological challenges for future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992065803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992065803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954579416000985
DO - 10.1017/S0954579416000985
M3 - Article
C2 - 27772536
AN - SCOPUS:84992065803
SN - 0954-5794
VL - 29
SP - 1001
EP - 1021
JO - Development and Psychopathology
JF - Development and Psychopathology
IS - 3
ER -