The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting

Gary W. Edelson, David G. Armstrong, Lawrence A. Lavery, Gene Caicco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations


Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2373-2378
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of internal medicine
Issue number20
StatePublished - Nov 11 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this