TY - JOUR
T1 - The 2016 Mw 7.8 pedernales, Ecuador, earthquake
T2 - Rapid response deployment
AU - Meltzer, Anne
AU - Hoskins, Mariah
AU - Soto-Cordero, Lillian
AU - Stachnik, Joshua C.
AU - Beck, Susan
AU - Lynner, Colton
AU - Porritt, Rob
AU - Portner, Daniel
AU - Ruiz, Mario
AU - Alvarado, Alexandra
AU - Hernandez, Stephen
AU - Yepes, Hugo
AU - Charvis, Philippe
AU - Font, Yvonne
AU - Regnier, Marc
AU - Agurto-Detzel, Hans
AU - Rietbrock, Andreas
AU - Leon-Rios, Sergio
AU - Diego Mercerat, E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The U.S. Seismic Rapid Response deployment was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Program Award Number EAR-1642498 and by the Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere (PASSCAL) facility of the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) through the PASSCAL Instrument Center at New Mexico Tech with support from the NSF under Cooperative Agreement Number EAR-1261681 and by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration. Financial support for the international rapid response effort was provided by: the Instituto Geofísico at the Escuela Politécnica Nacional (IG-EPN) in Quito Ecuador; L'Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Géoazur at Université de la Côte d'Azur, and Centre d'études et d'expertise sur les risques, l'en-vironnement, la mobilité et l'aménagement (CEREMA) France; and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) in the United Kingdom. The authors thank the U.S. Embassy in Quito for expediting customs clearance for the IRIS-PASSCAL instrument shipment. The authors are grateful to Emilio Acosta, Carlos Ayol, Christian Cisneros, Marcos Cordova, Pablo Cruz, Carlos Macias, Marcelo Ortiz, Daniel Pacheco, Xavier Parra, Gabriela Ponce, Mónica Segovia, Daniel Sierra, Juan Carlos Singaucho, Ivan Tapa, Roberto Toapanda, and Mayra Vaca from IG-EPN for their assistance with logistics and fieldwork. They are also grateful to the many people of Esmeraldas and Manabí provinces, who allowed us to install stations on their property and made sure the stations were secure during the deployment. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments to improve the article.
Funding Information:
The U.S. Seismic Rapid Response deployment was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Program Award Number EAR-1642498 and by the Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere (PASSCAL) facility of the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) through the PASSCAL Instrument Center at New Mexico Tech with support from the NSF under Cooperative Agreement Number EAR-1261681 and by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration. Financial support for the international rapid response effort was provided by: the Instituto Geofísico at the Escuela Politécnica Nacional (IG-EPN) in Quito Ecuador; L’Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Géoazur at Université de la Côte d’Azur, and Centre d’études et d’expertise sur les risques, l’en-vironnement, la mobilité et l’aménagement (CEREMA) France; and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) in the United Kingdom. The authors thank the U.S. Embassy in Quito for expediting customs clearance for the IRIS-PASSCAL instrument shipment. The authors are grateful to Emilio Acosta, Carlos Ayol, Christian Cisneros, Marcos Cordova, Pablo Cruz, Carlos Macias, Marcelo Ortiz, Daniel Pacheco, Xavier Parra, Gabriela Ponce, Mónica Segovia, Daniel Sierra, Juan Carlos Singaucho, Ivan Tapa, Roberto Toapanda, and Mayra Vaca from IG-EPN for their assistance with logistics and fieldwork. They are also grateful to the many people of Esmeraldas and Manabí provinces, who allowed us to install stations on their property and made sure the stations were secure during the deployment. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments to improve the article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Seismological Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The April 2016 Pedernales earthquake ruptured a 100 km by 40 km segment of the subduction zone along the coast of Ecuador in an Mw 7.8 megathrust event east of the intersection of the Carnegie ridge with the trench. This portion of the subduction zone has ruptured on decadal time scales in similar size and larger earthquakes, and exhibits a range of slip behaviors, variations in segmentation, and degree of plate coupling along strike. Immediately after the earthquake, an international rapid response effort coordinated by the Instituto Geofísico at the Escuela Politécnica Nacional in Quito deployed 55 seismometers and 10 ocean-bottom seismometers above the rupture zone and adjacent areas to record aftershocks. In this article, we describe the details of the U.S. portion of the rapid response and present an earthquake catalog from May 2016 to May 2017 produced using data recorded by these stations. Aftershocks focus in distinct clusters within and around the rupture area and match spatial patterns observed in long-term seismicity. For the first two and a half months, aftershocks exhibit a relatively sharp cutoff to the north of the mainshock rupture. In early July, an earthquake swarm occurred ∼100 km to the northeast of the mainshock in the epicentral region of an Mw 7.8 earthquake in 1958. In December, an increase in seismicity occurred ∼70 km to the northeast of the mainshock in the epicentral region of the 1906 earthquake. Data from the Pedernales earthquake and aftershock sequence recorded by permanent seismic and geodetic networks in Ecuador and the dense aftershock deployment provide an opportunity to examine the persistence of asperities for large to great earthquakes over multiple seismic cycles, the role of asperities and slow slip in subduction-zone megathrust rupture, and the relationship between locked and creeping parts of the subduction interface.
AB - The April 2016 Pedernales earthquake ruptured a 100 km by 40 km segment of the subduction zone along the coast of Ecuador in an Mw 7.8 megathrust event east of the intersection of the Carnegie ridge with the trench. This portion of the subduction zone has ruptured on decadal time scales in similar size and larger earthquakes, and exhibits a range of slip behaviors, variations in segmentation, and degree of plate coupling along strike. Immediately after the earthquake, an international rapid response effort coordinated by the Instituto Geofísico at the Escuela Politécnica Nacional in Quito deployed 55 seismometers and 10 ocean-bottom seismometers above the rupture zone and adjacent areas to record aftershocks. In this article, we describe the details of the U.S. portion of the rapid response and present an earthquake catalog from May 2016 to May 2017 produced using data recorded by these stations. Aftershocks focus in distinct clusters within and around the rupture area and match spatial patterns observed in long-term seismicity. For the first two and a half months, aftershocks exhibit a relatively sharp cutoff to the north of the mainshock rupture. In early July, an earthquake swarm occurred ∼100 km to the northeast of the mainshock in the epicentral region of an Mw 7.8 earthquake in 1958. In December, an increase in seismicity occurred ∼70 km to the northeast of the mainshock in the epicentral region of the 1906 earthquake. Data from the Pedernales earthquake and aftershock sequence recorded by permanent seismic and geodetic networks in Ecuador and the dense aftershock deployment provide an opportunity to examine the persistence of asperities for large to great earthquakes over multiple seismic cycles, the role of asperities and slow slip in subduction-zone megathrust rupture, and the relationship between locked and creeping parts of the subduction interface.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066475368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066475368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0220180364
DO - 10.1785/0220180364
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85066475368
SN - 0895-0695
VL - 90
SP - 1346
EP - 1354
JO - Seismological Research Letters
JF - Seismological Research Letters
IS - 3
ER -