TY - JOUR
T1 - The 2010 Maule, Chile, coseismic gap and its relationship to the 25 march 2012 Mw 7.1 earthquake
AU - Kiser, Eric
AU - Ishii, Miaki
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - A backprojection method is applied to the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 and 25 March 2012 Mw 7.1 Maule, Chile, earthquakes using high-frequency (0.8-2 Hz) USArray data. During the 2010 event, highest energy release occurred north of the epicenter, with two subevents comprising this rupture. The gap between these subevents was about 100 km and 15 s, suggesting that P waves from the first subevent dynamically triggered the second subevent. This triggering can be explained as a consequence of stopping phases generated at the terminus of subevent 1, as the rupture encounters a region of low interseismic coupling. This argument is supported by the occurrence of the 2012 Mw 7.1 event, which is the largest interface earthquake since the 2010 mainshock and ruptured an area that completely filled the gap left from the mainshock. Seismic gaps, regions between the slip areas of past giant earthquakes, are known to have a higher potential for generating future large events. The results of this study show that a coseismic gap behaves similarly, and detailed imaging of rupture propagation can be used to identify areas that may produce large earthquakes. A comparable coseismic gap to the 2010 Chile gap is identified for the 2011Mw 9.0 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake that may be the site of a large event in the near future.
AB - A backprojection method is applied to the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 and 25 March 2012 Mw 7.1 Maule, Chile, earthquakes using high-frequency (0.8-2 Hz) USArray data. During the 2010 event, highest energy release occurred north of the epicenter, with two subevents comprising this rupture. The gap between these subevents was about 100 km and 15 s, suggesting that P waves from the first subevent dynamically triggered the second subevent. This triggering can be explained as a consequence of stopping phases generated at the terminus of subevent 1, as the rupture encounters a region of low interseismic coupling. This argument is supported by the occurrence of the 2012 Mw 7.1 event, which is the largest interface earthquake since the 2010 mainshock and ruptured an area that completely filled the gap left from the mainshock. Seismic gaps, regions between the slip areas of past giant earthquakes, are known to have a higher potential for generating future large events. The results of this study show that a coseismic gap behaves similarly, and detailed imaging of rupture propagation can be used to identify areas that may produce large earthquakes. A comparable coseismic gap to the 2010 Chile gap is identified for the 2011Mw 9.0 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake that may be the site of a large event in the near future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875443393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875443393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0120120209
DO - 10.1785/0120120209
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:84875443393
SN - 0037-1106
VL - 103
SP - 1148
EP - 1153
JO - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
JF - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
IS - 2 A
ER -