Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations


In theory, the essence of emotion is coordination across experiential, behavioral, and physiological systems in the service of functional responding to environmental demands. However, people often regulate emotions, which could either reduce or enhance cross-system concordance. The present study tested the effects of two forms of emotion regulation (expressive suppression, positive reappraisal) on concordance of subjective experience (positive-negative valence), expressive behavior (positive and negative), and physiology (inter-beat interval, skin conductance, blood pressure) during conversations between unacquainted young women. As predicted, participants asked to suppress showed reduced concordance for both positive and negative emotions. Reappraisal instructions also reduced concordance for negative emotions, but increased concordance for positive ones. Both regulation strategies had contagious interpersonal effects on average levels of responding. Suppression reduced overall expression for both regulating and uninstructed partners, while reappraisal reduced negative experience. Neither strategy influenced the uninstructed partners' concordance. These results suggest that emotion regulation impacts concordance by altering the temporal coupling of phasic subsystem responses, rather than by having divergent effects on subsystem tonic levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-18
Number of pages13
JournalBiological Psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 2014


  • Coherence
  • Concordance
  • Cross-correlation
  • Emotion regulation
  • Interpersonal emotion
  • Reappraisal
  • Suppression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this