TY - JOUR
T1 - Taking College Teachers’ Working Conditions Seriously
T2 - Adjunct Faculty and Negotiating a Labor-based Conception of Quality
AU - Rhoades, Gary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Ohio State University.
PY - 2020/4/15
Y1 - 2020/4/15
N2 - This study takes college teaching/educational quality seriously by taking teachers’ working conditions seriously. Data consist of contractual provisions about adjunct faculty members’ access to instructional resources and professional development in 254 collective bargaining agreements. The research analyzes the negotiated balance in quality-related working conditions between professional rights and managerial discretion, stratified access to those working conditions in the collectively negotiated jurisdiction between part- and full-time faculty, as well as explicit references to educational quality and/or public benefits/beneficiaries. The findings indicate gains in adjunct faculty rights/voice, some parity with full-time faculty in quality-related working conditions, and some explicit references to quality/public benefits. But they also speak to considerable managerial discretion in not providing those conditions, and adjunct faculty’s lesser access to them. The research builds on and extends literature on academic employees’ working conditions, finding value in a labor-based conception of basic, quality-related working conditions, and in conceptualizing professorial stratification as fluid, contingent, and shaped by collectively negotiated jurisdiction. It also points to the feasibility of enhancing adjunct faculty working conditions by linking them to higher education attending more to educational quality and public purpose in better serving students and society.
AB - This study takes college teaching/educational quality seriously by taking teachers’ working conditions seriously. Data consist of contractual provisions about adjunct faculty members’ access to instructional resources and professional development in 254 collective bargaining agreements. The research analyzes the negotiated balance in quality-related working conditions between professional rights and managerial discretion, stratified access to those working conditions in the collectively negotiated jurisdiction between part- and full-time faculty, as well as explicit references to educational quality and/or public benefits/beneficiaries. The findings indicate gains in adjunct faculty rights/voice, some parity with full-time faculty in quality-related working conditions, and some explicit references to quality/public benefits. But they also speak to considerable managerial discretion in not providing those conditions, and adjunct faculty’s lesser access to them. The research builds on and extends literature on academic employees’ working conditions, finding value in a labor-based conception of basic, quality-related working conditions, and in conceptualizing professorial stratification as fluid, contingent, and shaped by collectively negotiated jurisdiction. It also points to the feasibility of enhancing adjunct faculty working conditions by linking them to higher education attending more to educational quality and public purpose in better serving students and society.
KW - Adjunct faculty
KW - collective bargaining
KW - educational quality
KW - professional rights
KW - professional stratification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074029022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074029022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00221546.2019.1664196
DO - 10.1080/00221546.2019.1664196
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074029022
SN - 0022-1546
VL - 91
SP - 327
EP - 352
JO - Journal of Higher Education
JF - Journal of Higher Education
IS - 3
ER -