Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellula Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline

  • John D. Gordan
  • , Erin B. Kennedy
  • , Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa
  • , Muhammad Shaalan Beg
  • , Steven T. Brower
  • , Terence P. Gade
  • , Laura Goff
  • , Shilpi Gupta
  • , Jennifer Guy
  • , William P. Harris
  • , Renuka Iyer
  • , Ishmael Jaiyesimi
  • , Minaxi Jhawer
  • , Asha Karippot
  • , Ahmed O. Kaseb
  • , R. Kate Kelley
  • , Jennifer J. Knox
  • , Jeremy Kortmansky
  • , Andrea Leaf
  • , William M. Remak
  • Rachna T. Shroff, Davendra P.S. Sohal, Tamar H. Taddei, Neeta K. Venepalli, Andrea Wilson, Andrew X. Zhu, Michal G. Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and provide recommended care options for this patient population. RESULTS Nine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS Atezolizumab 1 bevacizumab (atezo 1 bev) may be offered as first-line treatment of most patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and following management of esophageal varices, when present, according to institutional guidelines. Where there are contraindications to atezolizumab and/or bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or lenvatinib may be offered as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Following first-line treatment with atezo 1 bev, and until better data are available, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options for appropriate candidates include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, or ramucirumab (for patients with a-fetoprotein $ 400 ng/mL), or atezo 1 bev where patients did not have access to this option as first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also reasonable options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Consideration of nivolumab 1 ipilimumab as an option for second-line therapy and third-line therapy is discussed. Further guidance on choosing between therapy options is included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4317-4345
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number36
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 20 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellula Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this