TY - JOUR
T1 - Survival Analysis of Advanced HCC Treated with Radioembolization
T2 - Comparing Impact of Clinical Performance Status Versus Vascular Invasion/Metastases
AU - Ali, Rehan
AU - Gabr, Ahmed
AU - Abouchaleh, Nadine
AU - Al Asadi, Ali
AU - Mora, Ronald A.
AU - Kulik, Laura
AU - Abecassis, Michael
AU - Riaz, Ahsun
AU - Salem, Riad
AU - Lewandowski, Robert J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Purpose: In this study, we aim to compare the effects of prognostic indicators on survival analysis for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C patients undergoing yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y-90). Methods: A prospectively acquired database (2003–2017) for BCLC C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients that underwent radioembolization with Y-90 was searched. The criteria for BCLC C status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 1 or 2, metastases, and/or portal vein thrombosis (PVT)) were recorded. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed from the date of the first radioembolization with Y-90, censored to curative treatment, to determine median overall survival (OS). Cox regression hazards model was used for multivariate analyses. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: 547 BCLC C patients treated with radioembolization with Y-90 had a median OS of 10.7 months (range: 9.5–12.9). 43% (233 of 547) patients classified as BCLC C solely by their ECOG PS had a median OS of 19.4 months (14.7–23.7); 57% (314 of 547) patients with PVT/metastases had a median OS of 7.7 months (6.7–8.7). On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was not found to be a statistically significant prognostic indicator of OS in BCLC C whereas metastases and PVT exhibited hazards ratios (95%CI) of 0.51 (0.38–0.69) and 0.49 (0.38–0.63), respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Patients classified as BCLC C due to ECOG PS 1 demonstrated longer survival when compared to those presenting with PVT, metastases and/or ECOG PS 2. Hence, ECOG PS 1, as an isolated variable, may not be a true indicator of advanced disease.
AB - Purpose: In this study, we aim to compare the effects of prognostic indicators on survival analysis for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C patients undergoing yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y-90). Methods: A prospectively acquired database (2003–2017) for BCLC C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients that underwent radioembolization with Y-90 was searched. The criteria for BCLC C status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 1 or 2, metastases, and/or portal vein thrombosis (PVT)) were recorded. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed from the date of the first radioembolization with Y-90, censored to curative treatment, to determine median overall survival (OS). Cox regression hazards model was used for multivariate analyses. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: 547 BCLC C patients treated with radioembolization with Y-90 had a median OS of 10.7 months (range: 9.5–12.9). 43% (233 of 547) patients classified as BCLC C solely by their ECOG PS had a median OS of 19.4 months (14.7–23.7); 57% (314 of 547) patients with PVT/metastases had a median OS of 7.7 months (6.7–8.7). On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was not found to be a statistically significant prognostic indicator of OS in BCLC C whereas metastases and PVT exhibited hazards ratios (95%CI) of 0.51 (0.38–0.69) and 0.49 (0.38–0.63), respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Patients classified as BCLC C due to ECOG PS 1 demonstrated longer survival when compared to those presenting with PVT, metastases and/or ECOG PS 2. Hence, ECOG PS 1, as an isolated variable, may not be a true indicator of advanced disease.
KW - Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging
KW - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
KW - Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028892809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028892809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00270-017-1791-1
DO - 10.1007/s00270-017-1791-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 28879621
AN - SCOPUS:85028892809
SN - 0174-1551
VL - 41
SP - 260
EP - 269
JO - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 2
ER -