TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting scientific practice through model-based inquiry
T2 - A students’-eye view of grappling with data, uncertainty, and community in a laboratory experience
AU - Bolger, Molly S.
AU - Osness, Jordan B.
AU - Gouvea, Julia S.
AU - Cooper, Alexandra C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 M. S. Bolger et al.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Modeling is a scientific practice that supports creative reasoning, motivates inquiry, and facilitates community sense-making. This paper explores students’ perspectives on modeling in an undergraduate laboratory course, Authentic Inquiry through Modeling (AIM-Bio), in which they proposed, tested, and revised their own models. We conducted comparative case studies of eight students over a semester. Students described using models to support multiple forms of scientific reasoning and hypothesis generation. They recounted the challenges of dealing with uncertainty and integrating diverse ideas. They also described how these challenges pushed their thinking. Overall, students reported feeling a sense of scientific authenticity and agency through their modeling experience. We additionally provide an in-depth look at two students whose unique experiences in AIM-Bio emphasize the variable ways modeling can support inquiry learning. We claim that modeling emerged as a legitimate practice among students, because the AIM-Bio curriculum encouraged diversity in students’ models, provided opportunities for students to grapple with uncertainty, and fostered collaboration between students. We suggest that biology educators consider how model-based inquiry can allow students to participate in science, as a way to support interest in, identification with, and ultimately persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
AB - Modeling is a scientific practice that supports creative reasoning, motivates inquiry, and facilitates community sense-making. This paper explores students’ perspectives on modeling in an undergraduate laboratory course, Authentic Inquiry through Modeling (AIM-Bio), in which they proposed, tested, and revised their own models. We conducted comparative case studies of eight students over a semester. Students described using models to support multiple forms of scientific reasoning and hypothesis generation. They recounted the challenges of dealing with uncertainty and integrating diverse ideas. They also described how these challenges pushed their thinking. Overall, students reported feeling a sense of scientific authenticity and agency through their modeling experience. We additionally provide an in-depth look at two students whose unique experiences in AIM-Bio emphasize the variable ways modeling can support inquiry learning. We claim that modeling emerged as a legitimate practice among students, because the AIM-Bio curriculum encouraged diversity in students’ models, provided opportunities for students to grapple with uncertainty, and fostered collaboration between students. We suggest that biology educators consider how model-based inquiry can allow students to participate in science, as a way to support interest in, identification with, and ultimately persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120560005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120560005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128
DO - 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128
M3 - Article
C2 - 34678041
AN - SCOPUS:85120560005
SN - 1931-7913
VL - 20
JO - CBE life sciences education
JF - CBE life sciences education
IS - 4
M1 - ar59
ER -