Abstract
A preference for diversity has been identified as an important predictor of tie formation in certain networks, both social and organizational, that also exhibit a high degree of suppleness-the ability to retain their general form and character under stress (Durkheim, 1893/1997. The division of labor in society; Powell et al., 1996. Administrative Science Quarterly 116-145; Powell et al., 2005. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205; Koput & Gutek, 2010. Gender stratification in the IT industry: Sex, status and social capital. Edward Elgar Publishing). Extant models of preferential attachment, based on popularity, similarity, and cohesion, meanwhile, produce exceedingly brittle networks (Albert et al., 2000. Nature, 406(6794), 378-382; Callaway et al., 2000. Physical Review Letters, 85(25), 5468-5471; Holme et al., 2002. Physical Review E, 65(2), 026107; Shore et al., 2013 Social Networks, 35(1), 116-123). A model of preferential attachment based on diversity is introduced and simulated, demonstrating that a preference for diversity can create a structure characterized by suppleness. This occurs because a preference for diversity promotes overlapping and redundant weak ties during the early stages of network formation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 303-325 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Network Science |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- complex networks
- diversity
- preferential attachment
- resilience
- social networks
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Communication
- Sociology and Political Science