TY - JOUR
T1 - Subjective response to respirator type
T2 - Effect of disease status and gender
AU - Harber, Philip
AU - Santiago, Silverio
AU - Wu, Samantha
AU - Bansal, Siddharth
AU - Liu, Yihang
AU - Yun, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant R01 OH-8119 from CDC/NIOSH .
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Objective: To assess the effect of respirator type and user characteristics (eg, health status) on the subjective response to respirator use. Methods: The subjective responses for multiple domains were evaluated in 104 volunteers performing work tasks in a simulated work environment. Each used a dual cartridge half face mask and a filtering facepiece (N95) respirator. The study population was recruited to include four groups (normal respiratory status, mild asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic rhinitis). Mixed model regression analyses determined the effects of respirator type, disease, gender, and age. Results: Half face mask produced more adverse subjective response than the N95 for most scales. There were significant interactions such that disease status modified the effect of respirator type. In general, women reported greater adverse ratings than did men. Conclusions: The effect of respirator type depends on disease status. Respirator design evaluation panels should include persons with mild respiratory disease.
AB - Objective: To assess the effect of respirator type and user characteristics (eg, health status) on the subjective response to respirator use. Methods: The subjective responses for multiple domains were evaluated in 104 volunteers performing work tasks in a simulated work environment. Each used a dual cartridge half face mask and a filtering facepiece (N95) respirator. The study population was recruited to include four groups (normal respiratory status, mild asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic rhinitis). Mixed model regression analyses determined the effects of respirator type, disease, gender, and age. Results: Half face mask produced more adverse subjective response than the N95 for most scales. There were significant interactions such that disease status modified the effect of respirator type. In general, women reported greater adverse ratings than did men. Conclusions: The effect of respirator type depends on disease status. Respirator design evaluation panels should include persons with mild respiratory disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77049099126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77049099126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cfcf09
DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cfcf09
M3 - Article
C2 - 20134339
AN - SCOPUS:77049099126
SN - 1076-2752
VL - 52
SP - 150
EP - 154
JO - Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
JF - Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
IS - 2
ER -