TY - JOUR
T1 - Studying online activism
T2 - The effects of sampling design on findings
AU - Earl, Jennifer
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to thank the National Science Foundation for generous support of this research through an NSF CAREER Award (SES-0547990) and to thank the many research assistants who worked on this project (see http://jearl.faculty.arizona.edu/internet-and-activism-lab for a full listing). Thanks also to Heidi Reynolds-Stenson and Misty Ring for their research assistance and to the anonymous reviewers and the special editor, Neal Caren, for their comments on previous drafts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 Mobilization: An International Quarterly.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Social movement scholars are increasingly interested in Internet activism but have struggled to find robust methods for identifying cases, particularly representative samples of online protest content, given that no population list exists. This article reviews early approaches to this problem, focusing on three recent case sampling designs that attempt to address this problem. The first approach purposively samples from an organizationally based sampling frame. The second approach randomly samples from a SMO-based sampling frame. The third approach mimics user routines to identify populations of "reachable" websites on a given topic, which are then randomly sampled. For each approach, I examine the sampling frame and sampling method to understand how cases were selected, outline the assumptions built into the overall sampling design, and discuss an exemplary research project employing each design. Comparisons of findings from these exemplar studies indicate that sampling designs are extremely consequential. I close by recommending best practices.
AB - Social movement scholars are increasingly interested in Internet activism but have struggled to find robust methods for identifying cases, particularly representative samples of online protest content, given that no population list exists. This article reviews early approaches to this problem, focusing on three recent case sampling designs that attempt to address this problem. The first approach purposively samples from an organizationally based sampling frame. The second approach randomly samples from a SMO-based sampling frame. The third approach mimics user routines to identify populations of "reachable" websites on a given topic, which are then randomly sampled. For each approach, I examine the sampling frame and sampling method to understand how cases were selected, outline the assumptions built into the overall sampling design, and discuss an exemplary research project employing each design. Comparisons of findings from these exemplar studies indicate that sampling designs are extremely consequential. I close by recommending best practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979734833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979734833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17813/maiq.18.4.54261246r8w05865
DO - 10.17813/maiq.18.4.54261246r8w05865
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84979734833
SN - 1086-671X
VL - 18
SP - 389
EP - 406
JO - Mobilization
JF - Mobilization
IS - 4
ER -