TY - JOUR
T1 - Student Affairs Professionals’ Roles in Advancing Gender Inclusive Housing
T2 - Discourses of Dominance and Resistance
AU - Marine, Susan B.
AU - Wagner, Rachel
AU - Nicolazzo, Z.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Gender inclusive housing (GIH) is a recent policy development designed to enable greater inclusion of students of all genders in residential housing (Garvey, Chang, Nicolazzo, & Jackson, 2018; Taub, Johnson, & Reynolds, 2016). Student affairs practitioners (SAPs) play important roles advocating for improved policies and procedures on campus (Schuh, Jones, & Torres, 2016), fostering inclusion for underrepresented groups (Pope, Reynolds, & Mueller, 2014), and serving as social change agents (Gaston-Gayles, Wolf-Wendel, Tuttle, Twombly, & Ward, 2005). This study used critical narrative analysis to explore the roles and challenges faced by SAPs in the establishment of GIH on their campuses. In their narratives, normative discourses regarding the fear of parental disapproval, the stereotype of the deceptive trans* person, and the primacy of building codes as deterrents for GIH were surfaced. Strategies for resistance, such as providing counterstories that center trans* student experiences, and the costly impact of these normative discourses on the housing experiences of trans* students, were also explored. Recommendations for the advancement of student affairs’ roles in advocating for GIH and other critical resistance practices in the age of neoliberal higher education are advanced.
AB - Gender inclusive housing (GIH) is a recent policy development designed to enable greater inclusion of students of all genders in residential housing (Garvey, Chang, Nicolazzo, & Jackson, 2018; Taub, Johnson, & Reynolds, 2016). Student affairs practitioners (SAPs) play important roles advocating for improved policies and procedures on campus (Schuh, Jones, & Torres, 2016), fostering inclusion for underrepresented groups (Pope, Reynolds, & Mueller, 2014), and serving as social change agents (Gaston-Gayles, Wolf-Wendel, Tuttle, Twombly, & Ward, 2005). This study used critical narrative analysis to explore the roles and challenges faced by SAPs in the establishment of GIH on their campuses. In their narratives, normative discourses regarding the fear of parental disapproval, the stereotype of the deceptive trans* person, and the primacy of building codes as deterrents for GIH were surfaced. Strategies for resistance, such as providing counterstories that center trans* student experiences, and the costly impact of these normative discourses on the housing experiences of trans* students, were also explored. Recommendations for the advancement of student affairs’ roles in advocating for GIH and other critical resistance practices in the age of neoliberal higher education are advanced.
KW - critical resistance
KW - gender inclusion
KW - transgender students
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061079554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061079554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/dhe0000103
DO - 10.1037/dhe0000103
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061079554
SN - 1938-8926
VL - 12
SP - 219
EP - 229
JO - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
JF - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
IS - 3
ER -