TY - JOUR
T1 - Structure of the crust and African slab beneath the central Anatolian plateau from receiver functions
T2 - New insights on isostatic compensation and slab dynamics
AU - Abgarmi, Bizhan
AU - Delph, Jonathan R.
AU - Arda Ozacar, A.
AU - Beck, Susan L.
AU - Zandt, George
AU - Sandvol, Eric
AU - Turkelli, Niyazi
AU - Biryol, C. Berk
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by National Science Foundation grant EAR-1109336 to Beck. The stacking windowing analysis (SWA) code is available by contacting Abgarmi or Delph. We thank Dogan Kalafat and Metin Kahraman for providing the relocated earthquake data, and Nuretdin Kaymakçi for providing the digital database of the faults in Anatolia. We also thank Van Hinsbergen and the anonymous reviewer for their careful reading of our manuscript and insightful comments and suggestions. The portable seismic instruments used in Continental Dynamics-Central Anatolian Tectonics (CD-CAT) deployment were provided by IRIS PASSCAL (Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere) and the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. The figures in this study were produced using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) developed by Wessel and Smith (1991).
Funding Information:
This research was funded by National Science Foundation grant EAR-1109336 to Beck. The stacking windowing analysis (SWA) code is available by contacting Abgarmi or Delph. We thank Dogan Kalafat and Metin Kahraman for providing the relocated earthquake data, and Nuretdin Kaymakçı for providing the digital database of the faults in Anatolia. We also thank Van Hinsbergen and the anonymous reviewer for their careful reading of our manuscript and insightful comments and suggestions. The portable seismic instruments used in Continental Dynamics–Central Anatolian Tectonics (CD-CAT) deployment were provided by IRIS PASSCAL (Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere) and the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. The figures in this study were produced using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) developed by Wessel and Smith (1991).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Geological Society of America.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - The central Anatolian plateau in Turkey is a region with a long history of subduction, continental collision, accretion of continental fragments, and slab tearing and/or breakoffand tectonic escape. Central Anatolia is currently characterized as a nascent plateau with widespread Neogene volcanism and predominantly transtensional deformation. To elucidate the present-day crustal and upper mantle structure of this region, teleseismic receiver functions were calculated from 500 seismic events recorded on 92 temporary and permanent broadband seismic stations. Overall, we see a good correlation between crustal thickness and elevation throughout central Anatolia, indicating that the crust may be well compensated throughout the region. We observe the thickest crust beneath the Taurus Mountains (> 40 km); it thins rapidly to the south in the Adana Basin and Arabian plate and to the northwest across the Inner Tauride suture beneath the Tuz Gölü Basin and Kirsehir block. Within the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province, we observe several low seismic velocity layers ranging from 15 to 25 km depth that spatially correlate with the Neogene volcanism in the region, and may represent crustal magma reservoirs. Beneath the central Taurus Mountains, we observe a positive amplitude, subhorizontal receiver function arrival below the Anatolian continental Moho at ~50-80 km that we interpret as the gently dipping Moho of the subducting African lithosphere abruptly ending near the northernmost extent of the central Taurus Mountains. We suggest that the uplift of the central Taurus Mountains (~2 km since 8 Ma), which are capped by flat-lying carbonates of late Miocene marine units, can be explained by an isostatic uplift during the late Miocene-Pliocene followed by slab breakoffand subsequent rebound coeval with the onset of faster uplift rates during the late Pliocene-early Pleistocene. The Moho signature of the subducting African lithosphere terminates near the southernmost extent of the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province, where geochemical signatures in the Quaternary volcanics indicate that asthenospheric material is rising to shallow mantle depths.
AB - The central Anatolian plateau in Turkey is a region with a long history of subduction, continental collision, accretion of continental fragments, and slab tearing and/or breakoffand tectonic escape. Central Anatolia is currently characterized as a nascent plateau with widespread Neogene volcanism and predominantly transtensional deformation. To elucidate the present-day crustal and upper mantle structure of this region, teleseismic receiver functions were calculated from 500 seismic events recorded on 92 temporary and permanent broadband seismic stations. Overall, we see a good correlation between crustal thickness and elevation throughout central Anatolia, indicating that the crust may be well compensated throughout the region. We observe the thickest crust beneath the Taurus Mountains (> 40 km); it thins rapidly to the south in the Adana Basin and Arabian plate and to the northwest across the Inner Tauride suture beneath the Tuz Gölü Basin and Kirsehir block. Within the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province, we observe several low seismic velocity layers ranging from 15 to 25 km depth that spatially correlate with the Neogene volcanism in the region, and may represent crustal magma reservoirs. Beneath the central Taurus Mountains, we observe a positive amplitude, subhorizontal receiver function arrival below the Anatolian continental Moho at ~50-80 km that we interpret as the gently dipping Moho of the subducting African lithosphere abruptly ending near the northernmost extent of the central Taurus Mountains. We suggest that the uplift of the central Taurus Mountains (~2 km since 8 Ma), which are capped by flat-lying carbonates of late Miocene marine units, can be explained by an isostatic uplift during the late Miocene-Pliocene followed by slab breakoffand subsequent rebound coeval with the onset of faster uplift rates during the late Pliocene-early Pleistocene. The Moho signature of the subducting African lithosphere terminates near the southernmost extent of the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province, where geochemical signatures in the Quaternary volcanics indicate that asthenospheric material is rising to shallow mantle depths.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036454146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036454146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1130/GES01509.1
DO - 10.1130/GES01509.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85036454146
VL - 13
SP - 1774
EP - 1787
JO - Geosphere
JF - Geosphere
SN - 1553-040X
IS - 6
ER -