TY - JOUR
T1 - Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids
AU - Lemanske, Robert F.
AU - Mauger, David T.
AU - Sorkness, Christine A.
AU - Jackson, Daniel J.
AU - Boehmer, Susan J.
AU - Martinez, Fernando D.
AU - Strunk, Robert C.
AU - Szefler, Stanley J.
AU - Zeiger, Robert S.
AU - Bacharier, Leonard B.
AU - Covar, Ronina A.
AU - Guilbert, Theresa W.
AU - Larsen, Gary
AU - Morgan, Wayne J.
AU - Moss, Mark H.
AU - Spahn, Joseph D.
AU - Taussig, Lynn M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL064307, HL064288, HL064295, HL064287, HL064305, and HL064313), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007635), and the Clinical Translational Science Award program of the National Center for Research Resources (UL1-RR025011 [Wisconsin], UL1-RR025780 [Colorado], and UL1-RR024992 [St. Louis]). This study was performed in part by the General Clinical Research Centers at Washington University School of Medicine (M01-RR00036), National Jewish Health (M01-RR00051), and the University of Wisconsin (M01-RR03186).
PY - 2010/3/18
Y1 - 2010/3/18
N2 - BACKGROUND: For children who have uncontrolled asthma despite the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), evidence to guide step-up therapy is lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned 182 children (6 to 17 years of age), who had uncontrolled asthma while receiving 100 μg of fluticasone twice daily, to receive each of three blinded step-up therapies in random order for 16 weeks: 250 μg of fluticasone twice daily (ICS step-up), 100 μg of fluticasone plus 50 μg of a long-acting beta-agonist twice daily (LABA step-up), or 100 μg of fluticasone twice daily plus 5 or 10 mg of a leukotriene-receptor antagonist daily (LTRA step-up). We used a triple-cross-over design and a composite of three outcomes (exacerbations, asthma-control days, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second) to determine whether the frequency of a differential response to the step-up regimens was more than 25%. RESULTS: A differential response occurred in 161 of 165 patients who were evaluated (P<0.001). The response to LABA step-up therapy was most likely to be the best response, as compared with responses to LTRA step-up (relative probability, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.3; P = 0.004) and ICS step-up (relative probability, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4; P = 0.002). Higher scores on the Asthma Control Test before randomization (indicating better control at baseline) predicted a better response to LABA step-up (P = 0.009). White race predicted a better response to LABA step-up, whereas black patients were least likely to have a best response to LTRA step-up (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all the children had a differential response to each step-up therapy. LABA step-up was significantly more likely to provide the best response than either ICS or LTRA step-up. However, many children had a best response to ICS or LTRA step-up therapy, highlighting the need to regularly monitor and appropriately adjust each child's asthma therapy.
AB - BACKGROUND: For children who have uncontrolled asthma despite the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), evidence to guide step-up therapy is lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned 182 children (6 to 17 years of age), who had uncontrolled asthma while receiving 100 μg of fluticasone twice daily, to receive each of three blinded step-up therapies in random order for 16 weeks: 250 μg of fluticasone twice daily (ICS step-up), 100 μg of fluticasone plus 50 μg of a long-acting beta-agonist twice daily (LABA step-up), or 100 μg of fluticasone twice daily plus 5 or 10 mg of a leukotriene-receptor antagonist daily (LTRA step-up). We used a triple-cross-over design and a composite of three outcomes (exacerbations, asthma-control days, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second) to determine whether the frequency of a differential response to the step-up regimens was more than 25%. RESULTS: A differential response occurred in 161 of 165 patients who were evaluated (P<0.001). The response to LABA step-up therapy was most likely to be the best response, as compared with responses to LTRA step-up (relative probability, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.3; P = 0.004) and ICS step-up (relative probability, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4; P = 0.002). Higher scores on the Asthma Control Test before randomization (indicating better control at baseline) predicted a better response to LABA step-up (P = 0.009). White race predicted a better response to LABA step-up, whereas black patients were least likely to have a best response to LTRA step-up (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all the children had a differential response to each step-up therapy. LABA step-up was significantly more likely to provide the best response than either ICS or LTRA step-up. However, many children had a best response to ICS or LTRA step-up therapy, highlighting the need to regularly monitor and appropriately adjust each child's asthma therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949576423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949576423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1001278
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1001278
M3 - Article
C2 - 20197425
AN - SCOPUS:77949576423
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 362
SP - 975
EP - 985
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 11
ER -