Stating space in modern Mexico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


This paper critiques the largely Anglophone "New Cultural History" (NCH) written on post-revolutionary Mexico, calling for a more robust theoretical and methodological approach to the state than scholars have thus far employed. Earlier trends, each of course inflected with the politics of their times, remained fastened upon the purportedly unified force of Mexican officialdom. Revisionist narratives tended to abstract the state from social and cultural belief and practice. As such, scholars' grasp of social change was weakened by their failure to see politics, culture, and society as interrelated processes. Nevertheless, the closer examination of popular culture stressed by some contemporary historians-an undeniably important analytical tack-still does not obviate the need for a solid, at times even central, focus on processes of state-formation. Herein, I review some of the critical contributions to a growing multidisciplinary field of state/culture studies, and from critical human geography, and suggest ways their insights might be useful for historians and historical geographers focusing on the post-revolutionary Mexican state.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-473
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Geography
Issue number4
StatePublished - May 2007


  • Historical geography
  • Mexico
  • Political power
  • State-formation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Stating space in modern Mexico'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this