TY - JOUR
T1 - State growth management programs and central-city revitalization
AU - Dawkins, Casey J.
AU - Nelson, Arthur C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for the database assembly for this study was provided by the Fannie Mae Foundation and the Georgia Institute of Technology.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - During the latter part of the 20th century, many U.S. state governments adopted growth management programs for the purpose of establishing a more proactive role in the regulation of land use. Although many scholars have recently begun to critically examine the implementation of these new state initiatives, few have explored their effects on patterns of intraurban land development. In this article, we develop a framework for thinking about the likely effects of state growth management programs on a central city's ability to attract new residential construction activity and investigate this issue using a panel data approach. Multivariate regression results suggest that these programs have observable effects on the spatial distribution of residential construction activity within urban areas. Furthermore, we accept several hypotheses regarding coefficient stability across states, regions, and program designs. These findings suggest that state growth management programs may be an effective tool for promoting the revitalization of central cities.
AB - During the latter part of the 20th century, many U.S. state governments adopted growth management programs for the purpose of establishing a more proactive role in the regulation of land use. Although many scholars have recently begun to critically examine the implementation of these new state initiatives, few have explored their effects on patterns of intraurban land development. In this article, we develop a framework for thinking about the likely effects of state growth management programs on a central city's ability to attract new residential construction activity and investigate this issue using a panel data approach. Multivariate regression results suggest that these programs have observable effects on the spatial distribution of residential construction activity within urban areas. Furthermore, we accept several hypotheses regarding coefficient stability across states, regions, and program designs. These findings suggest that state growth management programs may be an effective tool for promoting the revitalization of central cities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346273971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346273971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01944360308976326
DO - 10.1080/01944360308976326
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0346273971
SN - 0194-4363
VL - 69
SP - 381
EP - 396
JO - Journal of the American Planning Association
JF - Journal of the American Planning Association
IS - 4
ER -