TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardization of care
T2 - Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery
AU - Thiele, Robert H.
AU - Rea, Kathleen M.
AU - Turrentine, Florence E.
AU - Friel, Charles M.
AU - Hassinger, Taryn E.
AU - Goudreau, Bernadette J.
AU - Umapathi, Bindu A.
AU - Kron, Irving L.
AU - Sawyer, Robert G.
AU - Hedrick, Traci L.
AU - McMurry, Timothy L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American College of Surgeons.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Background Colorectal surgery is associated with considerable morbidity and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Recognizing the need for improvement, we implemented an enhanced recovery (ER) protocol for all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at an academic institution. Study Design A multidisciplinary team implemented an ER protocol based on: preoperative counseling with active patient participation, carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia with avoidance of intravenous opioids, intraoperative goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding, and ambulation. Discharge requirements remained identical throughout. A before and after study design was undertaken comparing patients before (August 2012 to February 2013) and after implementation of an ER protocol (August 2013 to February 2014). Risk stratification was performed using the NSQIP risk calculator to calculate the predicted LOS for each patient based on 23 variables. Results One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent surgery within the ER protocol compared with 98 consecutive historical controls (conventional). The risk-adjusted predicted LOS was similar for each group at 5.1 and 5.2 days. Substantial reductions were seen in LOS, morphine equivalents, intravenous fluids, return of bowel function, and overall complications with the ER group. There was a $7,129/patient reduction in direct cost, corresponding to a cost savings of $777,061 in the ER group. Patient satisfaction as measured by Press Ganey improved considerably during the study period. Conclusions Implementation of an ER protocol led to improved patient satisfaction and substantial reduction in LOS, complication rates, and costs for patients undergoing both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These data demonstrate that small investments in the perioperative environment can lead to large returns.
AB - Background Colorectal surgery is associated with considerable morbidity and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Recognizing the need for improvement, we implemented an enhanced recovery (ER) protocol for all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at an academic institution. Study Design A multidisciplinary team implemented an ER protocol based on: preoperative counseling with active patient participation, carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia with avoidance of intravenous opioids, intraoperative goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding, and ambulation. Discharge requirements remained identical throughout. A before and after study design was undertaken comparing patients before (August 2012 to February 2013) and after implementation of an ER protocol (August 2013 to February 2014). Risk stratification was performed using the NSQIP risk calculator to calculate the predicted LOS for each patient based on 23 variables. Results One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent surgery within the ER protocol compared with 98 consecutive historical controls (conventional). The risk-adjusted predicted LOS was similar for each group at 5.1 and 5.2 days. Substantial reductions were seen in LOS, morphine equivalents, intravenous fluids, return of bowel function, and overall complications with the ER group. There was a $7,129/patient reduction in direct cost, corresponding to a cost savings of $777,061 in the ER group. Patient satisfaction as measured by Press Ganey improved considerably during the study period. Conclusions Implementation of an ER protocol led to improved patient satisfaction and substantial reduction in LOS, complication rates, and costs for patients undergoing both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These data demonstrate that small investments in the perioperative environment can lead to large returns.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925651451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925651451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.042
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 25797725
AN - SCOPUS:84925651451
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 220
SP - 430
EP - 443
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 4
ER -