Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: Implications for diagnosis and treatment

  • Marco G. Patti
  • , Maria V. Gorodner
  • , Carlos Galvani
  • , Pietro Tedesco
  • , Piero M. Fisichella
  • , James W. Ostroff
  • , Karen C. Bagatelos
  • , Lawrence W. Way
  • , John Hunter
  • , Stephen Jolley
  • , Raymond Joehl

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The named primary esophageal motility disorders (PEMDs) are achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), nutcracker esophagus (NE), and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HTN-LES). Although the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia are well defined, such is not the case with the other disorders. Hypothesis: (1) Symptoms do not reliably distinguish PEMDs from gastroesophageal reflux disease; (2) esophageal function tests are essential to this distinction and to identifying the type of PEMD; (3) minimally invasive surgery is effective for each condition; and (4) the laparoscopic approach is better than the thoracoscopic approach. Design: University hospital tertiary care center. Setting: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patients and Methods: A diagnosis of PEMD was established in 397 patients by esophagogram, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring. There were 305 patients (77%) with achalasia, 49 patients (12%) with DES, 41 patients (10%) with NE, and 2 patients (1%) with HTNLES. Two hundred eight patients (52%) underwent a myotomy by either a thoracoscopic or a laparoscopic approach. Results: Ninety-nine patients (25%) had a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease at the time of referral and had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. In achalasia and DES, a thoracoscopic or laparoscopic myotomy relieved dysphagia and chest pain in more than 80% of the patients. In contrast, in NE the results were less predictable, and the operation most often failed to relieve symptoms. Conclusions: These results show that (1) symptoms were unreliable in distinguishing gastroesophageal reflux disease from PEMDs; (2) esophageal function tests were essential to diagnose PEMD and to define its type; (3) the laparoscopic approach was better than the thoracoscopic approach; (4) a laparoscopic Heller myotomy is the treatment of choice for achalasia, DES, and HTNLES; and (5) a predictably good treatment for NE is still elusive, and the results of surgery were disappointing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-449
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume140
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: Implications for diagnosis and treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this