TY - JOUR
T1 - Sociodemographic correlates of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use in the United States, 2016–2017
AU - Spears, Claire Adams
AU - Jones, Dina M.
AU - Weaver, Scott R.
AU - Huang, Jidong
AU - Yang, Bo
AU - Pechacek, Terry F.
AU - Eriksen, Michael P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (NIH; grant P50DA036128), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH (grant K23AT008442).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives. To investigate use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among priority populations. Methods. Using 2016 through 2017 US nationally representative surveys (n = 11 688), we examined ENDS use by sociodemographic variables (age, education, poverty status, insurance, employment, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation) and combustible tobacco use. Results. Among individuals who currently use noncigarette combustible tobacco, those from certain backgrounds (young adults, those living below the poverty level, those less educated, sexual minorities, Blacks, Hispanics, and those without health insurance) were more likely to use ENDS. Among current cigarette smokers, those who were younger, living at or above poverty (ever use), with higher education (current use), sexual minority, and non-Black were more likely to use ENDS. Conclusions. Associations between sociodemographic variables and ENDS use varied depending on combustible tobacco use status, highlighting the need to consider multiple types of tobacco products to understand ENDS use among priority populations. The impact on tobacco disparities will ultimately depend on whether ENDS are used to transition completely away from combustible tobacco products and how this may differ across priority populations who use diverse tobacco products.
AB - Objectives. To investigate use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among priority populations. Methods. Using 2016 through 2017 US nationally representative surveys (n = 11 688), we examined ENDS use by sociodemographic variables (age, education, poverty status, insurance, employment, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation) and combustible tobacco use. Results. Among individuals who currently use noncigarette combustible tobacco, those from certain backgrounds (young adults, those living below the poverty level, those less educated, sexual minorities, Blacks, Hispanics, and those without health insurance) were more likely to use ENDS. Among current cigarette smokers, those who were younger, living at or above poverty (ever use), with higher education (current use), sexual minority, and non-Black were more likely to use ENDS. Conclusions. Associations between sociodemographic variables and ENDS use varied depending on combustible tobacco use status, highlighting the need to consider multiple types of tobacco products to understand ENDS use among priority populations. The impact on tobacco disparities will ultimately depend on whether ENDS are used to transition completely away from combustible tobacco products and how this may differ across priority populations who use diverse tobacco products.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070579777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070579777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305158
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305158
M3 - Article
C2 - 31318599
AN - SCOPUS:85070579777
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 109
SP - 1224
EP - 1232
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 9
ER -