TY - JOUR
T1 - Sins of Commission and Omission
T2 - The Implications of an Active–Passive Categorization of Counterproductive Work Behavior
AU - Evans, Jonathan B.
AU - Slaughter, Jerel E.
AU - Ganster, Mahira L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by funding from the Center of Leadership Ethics at the Eller College of Management, University of Arizona.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - This paper introduces an active–passive framework to the conceptualization and measurement of counterproductive work behavior (CWB), in order to establish a dimension that categorizes the content of behaviors within the existing interpersonally directed (CWBI) and organizationally directed (CWBO) framework. Doing so provides new insights into the relationship between workplace counterproductivity and sleep. Stressor-emotion models of CWB predict that employees engage in counterproductivity in response to workplace stressors, but extant research suggests that counterproductive behavior increases strain, including reduced sleep quality. We develop a new scale for measuring CWB that differentiates active and passive behaviors and demonstrates the potential for positive intrapsychic consequences for passive CWBI. In Study 1, using five samples, we demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity, reliability, and acceptable psychometric properties of a 19-item scale that reconceptualizes CWB into four dimensions: active CWBI, passive CWBI, active CWBO, and passive CWBO. In Study 2, using experience-sampling methodology, we found that when employees engage in active CWBO at work in the afternoon they experience reduced sleep quality that evening, whereas engaging in passive CWBI was related to increased sleep quality.
AB - This paper introduces an active–passive framework to the conceptualization and measurement of counterproductive work behavior (CWB), in order to establish a dimension that categorizes the content of behaviors within the existing interpersonally directed (CWBI) and organizationally directed (CWBO) framework. Doing so provides new insights into the relationship between workplace counterproductivity and sleep. Stressor-emotion models of CWB predict that employees engage in counterproductivity in response to workplace stressors, but extant research suggests that counterproductive behavior increases strain, including reduced sleep quality. We develop a new scale for measuring CWB that differentiates active and passive behaviors and demonstrates the potential for positive intrapsychic consequences for passive CWBI. In Study 1, using five samples, we demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity, reliability, and acceptable psychometric properties of a 19-item scale that reconceptualizes CWB into four dimensions: active CWBI, passive CWBI, active CWBO, and passive CWBO. In Study 2, using experience-sampling methodology, we found that when employees engage in active CWBO at work in the afternoon they experience reduced sleep quality that evening, whereas engaging in passive CWBI was related to increased sleep quality.
KW - Counterproductive work behavior
KW - Measurement
KW - Scale
KW - Sleep quality
KW - Workplace deviance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141636797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141636797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-022-05277-w
DO - 10.1007/s10551-022-05277-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141636797
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 187
SP - 97
EP - 117
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 1
ER -