TY - JOUR
T1 - Significant variability in response to inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma
AU - Szefler, Stanley J.
AU - Martin, Richard J.
AU - King, Tonya Sharp
AU - Boushey, Homer A.
AU - Cherniack, Reuben M.
AU - Chinchilli, Vernon M.
AU - Craig, Timothy J.
AU - Dolovich, Myrna
AU - Drazen, Jeffrey M.
AU - Fagan, Joanne K.
AU - Fahy, John V.
AU - Fish, James E.
AU - Ford, Jean G.
AU - Israel, Elliot
AU - Kiley, James
AU - Kraft, Monica
AU - Lazarus, Stephen C.
AU - Lemanske, Robert F.
AU - Mauger, Elizabeth
AU - Peters, Stephen P.
AU - Sorkness, Christine A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants U10 HL-51810, U10 HL-51823, U10 HL-51831, U10 HL-51834, U10 HL-51843, U10 HL-51845, and U10 HL-56443 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Funding Information:
This study was carried out in part in the General Clinical Research Centers at the University of Wisconsin, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Columbia University, and the University of California San Francisco with funds provided by the National Center for Research Resources (5 M01 RR-00079, M01-RR-00645, M01-RR02635, and M01-RR-03186, US Public Health Service).
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Background: A clinical model is needed to compare inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) with respect to efficacy. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the relative beneficial and systemic effects in a dose-response relationship for 2 ICSs. Methods: A 24-week, parallel, open-label, multicenter trial examined the benefit-risk ratio of 2 ICSs in persistent asthma. Benefit was assessed by improvements in FEV1 and PC20; risk was assessed by overnight plasma cortisol suppression. Thirty subjects were randomized to either beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168, 672, and 1344 μg/day (n = 15) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 88, 352, and 704 μg/day (n = 15), both administered by means of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with chlorofluorocarbon propellant via a spacer, in 3 consecutive 6-week intervals; this was followed by 3 weeks of FP dry powder inhaler (DPI) 2000 μg/day. Results: Maximum FEV1 response occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI and was not further increased by treatment with FP-DPI. Near-maximum methacholine PC20 improvement occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI. Both BDP-MDI and FP-MDI caused dose-dependent cortisol suppression. Responsiveness to ICS treatment was found to vary markedly among subjects. Good (>15%) FEV1 response, in contrast to poor (<5%) response, was found to be associated with high exhaled nitric oxide (median, 17.6 vs 11.1 ppb), high bronchodilator reversibility (25.2% vs 8.8%), and a low FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio (0.63 vs 0.73) before treatment. Excellent (>3 doubling dilutions) improvement in PC20, in contrast to poor (<1 doubling dilution) improvement, was found to be associated with high sputum eosinophil levels (3.4% vs 0.1%) and older age at onset of asthma (age, 20-29 years vs <10 years). Conclusions: Near-maximal FEV1 and PC20 effects occurred with low-medium dose for both ICSs in the subjects studied. High-dose ICS therapy did not significantly increase the efficacy measures that were evaluated, but it did increase the systemic effect measure, overnight cortisol secretion. Significant intersubject variability in response occurred with both ICSs. It is possible that higher doses of ICSs are necessary to manage more severe patients or to achieve goals of therapy not evaluated in this study, such as prevention of asthma exacerbations.
AB - Background: A clinical model is needed to compare inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) with respect to efficacy. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the relative beneficial and systemic effects in a dose-response relationship for 2 ICSs. Methods: A 24-week, parallel, open-label, multicenter trial examined the benefit-risk ratio of 2 ICSs in persistent asthma. Benefit was assessed by improvements in FEV1 and PC20; risk was assessed by overnight plasma cortisol suppression. Thirty subjects were randomized to either beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168, 672, and 1344 μg/day (n = 15) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 88, 352, and 704 μg/day (n = 15), both administered by means of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with chlorofluorocarbon propellant via a spacer, in 3 consecutive 6-week intervals; this was followed by 3 weeks of FP dry powder inhaler (DPI) 2000 μg/day. Results: Maximum FEV1 response occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI and was not further increased by treatment with FP-DPI. Near-maximum methacholine PC20 improvement occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI. Both BDP-MDI and FP-MDI caused dose-dependent cortisol suppression. Responsiveness to ICS treatment was found to vary markedly among subjects. Good (>15%) FEV1 response, in contrast to poor (<5%) response, was found to be associated with high exhaled nitric oxide (median, 17.6 vs 11.1 ppb), high bronchodilator reversibility (25.2% vs 8.8%), and a low FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio (0.63 vs 0.73) before treatment. Excellent (>3 doubling dilutions) improvement in PC20, in contrast to poor (<1 doubling dilution) improvement, was found to be associated with high sputum eosinophil levels (3.4% vs 0.1%) and older age at onset of asthma (age, 20-29 years vs <10 years). Conclusions: Near-maximal FEV1 and PC20 effects occurred with low-medium dose for both ICSs in the subjects studied. High-dose ICS therapy did not significantly increase the efficacy measures that were evaluated, but it did increase the systemic effect measure, overnight cortisol secretion. Significant intersubject variability in response occurred with both ICSs. It is possible that higher doses of ICSs are necessary to manage more severe patients or to achieve goals of therapy not evaluated in this study, such as prevention of asthma exacerbations.
KW - Asthma
KW - Beclomethasone dipropionate
KW - Exhaled nitric oxide
KW - Fluticasone propionate
KW - Inhaled corticosteroid
KW - Methacholine response
KW - Pulmonary response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036126690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036126690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mai.2002.122635
DO - 10.1067/mai.2002.122635
M3 - Article
C2 - 11897984
AN - SCOPUS:0036126690
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 109
SP - 410
EP - 418
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 3
ER -