TY - JOUR
T1 - Shared social and emotional activities within adolescent romantic and non-romantic sexual relationships
AU - Williams, Lela Rankin
AU - Russell, Stephen T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This research used data from Add Health, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 17 other agencies. Special acknowledgment is due to Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Anyone interested in obtaining data files from Add Health should contact Add Health, Carolina Population Center, 123 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524 (www.cpc.unc.edu/ addhealth/contract.html).Thisstudywassupported,inpart,byaWilliamT. Grant Foundation Scholar Award to Stephen T. Russell.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Typically, "non-romantic" sexual relationships are assumed to be casual; however, the emotional and social distinctions between romantic and non-romantic contexts are not well understood, particularly in adolescence. Data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) was used to compare shared emotional (e.g.; telling partner that they love her/him) and social (e.g.; going out in a group) activities within romantic and non-romantic sexual relationships. Adolescents who reported exclusively romantic sexual relationships (n = 1,891) shared more emotional, but not social, activities with their partners than adolescents who were in non-romantic sexual relationships (n = 315; small effect size, r =.07-.13), akin to adolescents who experienced both relationship types (n = 519; small-to-medium effect size, r =.18-.38). Girls shared more emotional and social activities with their partners than boys when in romantic relationships (small effect size, r =.06-.10); there were no significant gender differences within non-romantic sexual relationships. Findings suggest that gendered scripts remain for sexual relationships that are romantic but not for those that are non-romantic. Notably, for the majority of adolescents, non-romantic relationships still held many emotional and social dimensions typical of romantic relationships and differences between relationship types were small. Although non-romantic relationships were less intimate than romantic sexual relationships, there was remarkable heterogeneity within this relationship type. Caution is advised when working with adolescents engaged in "casual" sexual relationships. Understanding the complexity of adolescent sexual relationships is critical for the advancement of effective sex education programming.
AB - Typically, "non-romantic" sexual relationships are assumed to be casual; however, the emotional and social distinctions between romantic and non-romantic contexts are not well understood, particularly in adolescence. Data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) was used to compare shared emotional (e.g.; telling partner that they love her/him) and social (e.g.; going out in a group) activities within romantic and non-romantic sexual relationships. Adolescents who reported exclusively romantic sexual relationships (n = 1,891) shared more emotional, but not social, activities with their partners than adolescents who were in non-romantic sexual relationships (n = 315; small effect size, r =.07-.13), akin to adolescents who experienced both relationship types (n = 519; small-to-medium effect size, r =.18-.38). Girls shared more emotional and social activities with their partners than boys when in romantic relationships (small effect size, r =.06-.10); there were no significant gender differences within non-romantic sexual relationships. Findings suggest that gendered scripts remain for sexual relationships that are romantic but not for those that are non-romantic. Notably, for the majority of adolescents, non-romantic relationships still held many emotional and social dimensions typical of romantic relationships and differences between relationship types were small. Although non-romantic relationships were less intimate than romantic sexual relationships, there was remarkable heterogeneity within this relationship type. Caution is advised when working with adolescents engaged in "casual" sexual relationships. Understanding the complexity of adolescent sexual relationships is critical for the advancement of effective sex education programming.
KW - Adolescence
KW - Casual sex
KW - Friends with benefits
KW - Gender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876291765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876291765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-012-0043-3
DO - 10.1007/s10508-012-0043-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 23297147
AN - SCOPUS:84876291765
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 42
SP - 649
EP - 658
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 4
ER -