TY - JOUR
T1 - Sexual References and Consequences for Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Characters on Television
T2 - A Comparison Content Analysis
AU - Bond, Bradley James
AU - Miller, Brandon
AU - Aubrey, Jennifer Stevens
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Mass Communication & Society Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
PY - 2019/1/2
Y1 - 2019/1/2
N2 - A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.
AB - A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049783885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049783885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15205436.2018.1489058
DO - 10.1080/15205436.2018.1489058
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049783885
SN - 1520-5436
VL - 22
SP - 72
EP - 95
JO - Mass Communication and Society
JF - Mass Communication and Society
IS - 1
ER -