Abstract
The Evaluation of Risks scale was recently developed as a self-report inventory for assessing risk-taking propensity, but further validation is necessary because most studies have predominantly included male subjects. Because males commonly exhibit greater risk-taking propensity than females, evidence of such a sex difference on the scale would further support its construct validity. 29 men and 25 women equated for age (range: 18 to 36 years) completed the scale. Internal consistency of the scale was generally modest, particularly among women. Men scored significantly higher than women on four of nine indices of risk-taking propensity, including Danger Seeking, Energy, Invincibility, and Total Risk-Propensity. Factors measuring thrill seeking and danger seeking correlated positively with a concurrent measure of sensation seeking. Although the higher scores exhibited by men are consistent with prior research on other measures of risk-taking, further research on this scale with samples including women is warranted.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 693-700 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Psychological reports |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in self-reported risk-taking propensity on the Evaluation of Risks scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS