TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP
T2 - results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees
AU - Wani, Sachin
AU - Han, Samuel
AU - Simon, Violette
AU - Hall, Matthew
AU - Early, Dayna
AU - Aagaard, Eva
AU - Abidi, Wasif M.
AU - Banerjee, Subhas
AU - Baron, Todd H.
AU - Bartel, Michael
AU - Bowman, Erik
AU - Brauer, Brian C.
AU - Buscaglia, Jonathan M.
AU - Carlin, Linda
AU - Chak, Amitabh
AU - Chatrath, Hemant
AU - Choudhary, Abhishek
AU - Confer, Bradley
AU - Coté, Gregory A.
AU - Das, Koushik K.
AU - DiMaio, Christopher J.
AU - Dries, Andrew M.
AU - Edmundowicz, Steven A.
AU - El Chafic, Abdul Hamid
AU - El Hajj, Ihab
AU - Ellert, Swan
AU - Ferreira, Jason
AU - Gamboa, Anthony
AU - Gan, Ian S.
AU - Gangarosa, Lisa
AU - Gannavarapu, Bhargava
AU - Gordon, Stuart R.
AU - Guda, Nalini M.
AU - Hammad, Hazem T.
AU - Harris, Cynthia
AU - Jalaj, Sujai
AU - Jowell, Paul
AU - Kenshil, Sana
AU - Klapman, Jason
AU - Kochman, Michael L.
AU - Komanduri, Sri
AU - Lang, Gabriel
AU - Lee, Linda S.
AU - Loren, David E.
AU - Lukens, Frank J.
AU - Mullady, Daniel
AU - Muthusamy, Raman V.
AU - Nett, Andrew S.
AU - Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
AU - Pakseresht, Kavous
AU - Perera, Pranith
AU - Pfau, Patrick
AU - Piraka, Cyrus
AU - Poneros, John M.
AU - Rastogi, Amit
AU - Razzak, Anthony
AU - Riff, Brian
AU - Saligram, Shreyas
AU - Scheiman, James M.
AU - Schuster, Isaiah
AU - Shah, Raj J.
AU - Sharma, Rishi
AU - Spaete, Joshua P.
AU - Singh, Ajaypal
AU - Sohail, Muhammad
AU - Sreenarasimhaiah, Jayaprakash
AU - Stevens, Tyler
AU - Tabibian, James H.
AU - Tzimas, Demetrios
AU - Uppal, Dushant S.
AU - Urayama, Shiro
AU - Vitterbo, Domenico
AU - Wang, Andrew Y.
AU - Wassef, Wahid
AU - Yachimski, Patrick
AU - Zepeda-Gomez, Sergio
AU - Zuchelli, Tobias
AU - Keswani, Rajesh N.
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: The following author received research support for this study from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) 2015 Endoscopy Research Award and the University of Colorado Department of Medicine Outstanding Early Scholars Program: S. Wani. In addition, the following authors disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: S. Wani: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. J. M. Buscaglia, T. Stevens: Speaker and consultant for AbbVie and Boston Scientific. M. L. Kochman: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Dark Canyon Labs, Ferring, and Olympus. D. Mullady: Consultant for Boston Scientific; speaker for AbbVie. R. Shah, A. Rastogi: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook, and Olympus. P. Yachimski: Consultant for Boston Scientific. B.C. Brauer: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic; research grants from ERBE. M. Kochman: Consultant for BSC, Ferring, and Olympus; stock options from Dark Canyon Laboratory and Virgo Systems; Spouse, salary and stock options from Merck. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Research support for REDCap was provided by the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources Colorado Clinical Translational Science Institute grant number UL1 TR001082. The ASGE had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: The following author received research support for this study from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) 2015 Endoscopy Research Award and the University of Colorado Department of Medicine Outstanding Early Scholars Program: S. Wani. In addition, the following authors disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: S. Wani: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. J. M. Buscaglia, T. Stevens: Speaker and consultant for AbbVie and Boston Scientific. M. L. Kochman: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Dark Canyon Labs, Ferring, and Olympus. D. Mullady: Consultant for Boston Scientific; speaker for AbbVie. R. Shah, A. Rastogi: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook, and Olympus. P. Yachimski: Consultant for Boston Scientific. B.C. Brauer: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic; research grants from ERBE. M. Kochman: Consultant for BSC, Ferring, and Olympus; stock options from Dark Canyon Laboratory and Virgo Systems; Spouse, salary and stock options from Merck. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Research support for REDCap was provided by the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources Colorado Clinical Translational Science Institute grant number UL1 TR001082. The ASGE had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Funding Information:
Advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) were established, in part, to address the inability of traditional 3-year Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited gastroenterology fellowship programs to provide comprehensive ERCP and EUS training. 1,2 Since their inception, these AETPs have evolved to offer training in a myriad of additional procedures, including EMR, endoluminal stent placement, deep enteroscopy, advanced closure techniques, bariatric endoscopy, therapeutic EUS, and submucosal endoscopy (including endoscopic submucosal dissection and per-oral endoscopic myotomy). 3
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Background and Aims: Minimum EUS and ERCP volumes that should be offered per trainee in “high quality” advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) are not established. We aimed to define the number of procedures required by an “average” advanced endoscopy trainee (AET) to achieve competence in technical and cognitive EUS and ERCP tasks to help structure AETPs. Methods: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)-recognized AETPs were invited to participate; AETs were graded on every fifth EUS and ERCP examination using a validated tool. Grading for each skill was done using a 4-point scoring system, and learning curves using cumulative sum analysis for overall, technical, and cognitive components of EUS and ERCP were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept for each AET were used to generate aggregate learning curves, allowing us to use data from all AETs to estimate the average learning experience for trainees. Results: Among 62 invited AETPs, 37 AETs from 32 AETPs participated. Most AETs reported hands-on EUS (52%, median 20 cases) and ERCP (68%, median 50 cases) experience before starting an AETP. The median number of EUS and ERCPs performed per AET was 400 (range, 200-750) and 361 (range, 250-650), respectively. Overall, 2616 examinations were graded (EUS, 1277; ERCP-biliary, 1143; pancreatic, 196). Most graded EUS examinations were performed for pancreatobiliary indications (69.9%) and ERCP examinations for ASGE biliary grade of difficulty 1 (72.1%). The average AET achieved competence in core EUS and ERCP skills at approximately 225 and 250 cases, respectively. However, overall technical competence was achieved for grade 2 ERCP at about 300 cases. Conclusion: The thresholds provided for an average AET to achieve competence in EUS and ERCP may be used by the ASGE and AETPs in establishing the minimal standards for case volume exposure for AETs during their training. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02509416.)
AB - Background and Aims: Minimum EUS and ERCP volumes that should be offered per trainee in “high quality” advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) are not established. We aimed to define the number of procedures required by an “average” advanced endoscopy trainee (AET) to achieve competence in technical and cognitive EUS and ERCP tasks to help structure AETPs. Methods: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)-recognized AETPs were invited to participate; AETs were graded on every fifth EUS and ERCP examination using a validated tool. Grading for each skill was done using a 4-point scoring system, and learning curves using cumulative sum analysis for overall, technical, and cognitive components of EUS and ERCP were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept for each AET were used to generate aggregate learning curves, allowing us to use data from all AETs to estimate the average learning experience for trainees. Results: Among 62 invited AETPs, 37 AETs from 32 AETPs participated. Most AETs reported hands-on EUS (52%, median 20 cases) and ERCP (68%, median 50 cases) experience before starting an AETP. The median number of EUS and ERCPs performed per AET was 400 (range, 200-750) and 361 (range, 250-650), respectively. Overall, 2616 examinations were graded (EUS, 1277; ERCP-biliary, 1143; pancreatic, 196). Most graded EUS examinations were performed for pancreatobiliary indications (69.9%) and ERCP examinations for ASGE biliary grade of difficulty 1 (72.1%). The average AET achieved competence in core EUS and ERCP skills at approximately 225 and 250 cases, respectively. However, overall technical competence was achieved for grade 2 ERCP at about 300 cases. Conclusion: The thresholds provided for an average AET to achieve competence in EUS and ERCP may be used by the ASGE and AETPs in establishing the minimal standards for case volume exposure for AETs during their training. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02509416.)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063695503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063695503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.030
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 30738985
AN - SCOPUS:85063695503
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 89
SP - 1160-1168.e9
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -