TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone and subjective hearing screenings using Spanish-language questions
AU - Everett, Alyssa
AU - Wong, Aileen
AU - Piper, Rosie
AU - Cone, Barbara
AU - Marrone, Nicole
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Award R33DC013681 (awarded to PI: Marrone). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We gratefully acknowledge The University of Arizona audiology clinical faculty and graduate students for their contributions to hearing testing, especially Daisey Sanchez, Adriana Sanchez, Laura Coco, Clemente Morales, Giau Le, Julie Peterson, Erica Hansen, and Stephanie Adamovich. We are also grateful to the contributions of our community partners and participants.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivities and specificities of different audiometric hearing screening criteria and single-item and multi-item hearing disability questionnaires among a group of Spanish-speaking adults in a rural community. Method: Participants were 131 predominantly older (77% 65+ years) Hispanic/Latinx adults (98%). A structured Spanish-language interview and pure-tone threshold test data were analyzed for each participant. The sensitivities and specificities of three single questions and the Hearing Handicap Index for the Elderly–Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry & Weinstein, 1983) in Spanish, as well as three audiometric screening criteria, were evaluated in relation to the pure-tone threshold test for detecting hearing loss. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1–4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, “¿Creeustedquetiene pérdida de audición? (Do you think you have a hearing loss?),” was shown to be the most sensitive self-report screening compared to other single-item questions and the HHIE-S. This single question was as sensitive as an audiometric screening to detect a moderate hearingloss(>40dBHLineitherear).Resultsfrom the Spanish HHIE-S indicated poor performance to detect hearing loss in this population, consistent with previous research. Conclusions: Among older Spanish-speaking adults, self-reported hearing status had varying sensitivities depending on the question asked. However, of the tools evaluated, the self-perception question proved to be a more sensitive and specific tool than a multi-item screen. Objective audiometric testing (> 25 dB HL) resulted in the highest sensitivity to detect a mild hearing loss.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivities and specificities of different audiometric hearing screening criteria and single-item and multi-item hearing disability questionnaires among a group of Spanish-speaking adults in a rural community. Method: Participants were 131 predominantly older (77% 65+ years) Hispanic/Latinx adults (98%). A structured Spanish-language interview and pure-tone threshold test data were analyzed for each participant. The sensitivities and specificities of three single questions and the Hearing Handicap Index for the Elderly–Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry & Weinstein, 1983) in Spanish, as well as three audiometric screening criteria, were evaluated in relation to the pure-tone threshold test for detecting hearing loss. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1–4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, “¿Creeustedquetiene pérdida de audición? (Do you think you have a hearing loss?),” was shown to be the most sensitive self-report screening compared to other single-item questions and the HHIE-S. This single question was as sensitive as an audiometric screening to detect a moderate hearingloss(>40dBHLineitherear).Resultsfrom the Spanish HHIE-S indicated poor performance to detect hearing loss in this population, consistent with previous research. Conclusions: Among older Spanish-speaking adults, self-reported hearing status had varying sensitivities depending on the question asked. However, of the tools evaluated, the self-perception question proved to be a more sensitive and specific tool than a multi-item screen. Objective audiometric testing (> 25 dB HL) resulted in the highest sensitivity to detect a mild hearing loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081945560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081945560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053
DO - 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053
M3 - Article
C2 - 32073298
AN - SCOPUS:85081945560
SN - 1059-0889
VL - 29
SP - 35
EP - 49
JO - American Journal of Audiology
JF - American Journal of Audiology
IS - 1
ER -