TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone and subjective hearing screenings using Spanish-language questions
AU - Everett, Alyssa
AU - Wong, Aileen
AU - Piper, Rosie
AU - Cone, Barbara
AU - Marrone, Nicole
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivities and specificities of different audiometric hearing screening criteria and single-item and multi-item hearing disability questionnaires among a group of Spanish-speaking adults in a rural community. Method: Participants were 131 predominantly older (77% 65+ years) Hispanic/Latinx adults (98%). A structured Spanish-language interview and pure-tone threshold test data were analyzed for each participant. The sensitivities and specificities of three single questions and the Hearing Handicap Index for the Elderly–Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry & Weinstein, 1983) in Spanish, as well as three audiometric screening criteria, were evaluated in relation to the pure-tone threshold test for detecting hearing loss. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1–4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, “¿Creeustedquetiene pérdida de audición? (Do you think you have a hearing loss?),” was shown to be the most sensitive self-report screening compared to other single-item questions and the HHIE-S. This single question was as sensitive as an audiometric screening to detect a moderate hearingloss(>40dBHLineitherear).Resultsfrom the Spanish HHIE-S indicated poor performance to detect hearing loss in this population, consistent with previous research. Conclusions: Among older Spanish-speaking adults, self-reported hearing status had varying sensitivities depending on the question asked. However, of the tools evaluated, the self-perception question proved to be a more sensitive and specific tool than a multi-item screen. Objective audiometric testing (> 25 dB HL) resulted in the highest sensitivity to detect a mild hearing loss.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivities and specificities of different audiometric hearing screening criteria and single-item and multi-item hearing disability questionnaires among a group of Spanish-speaking adults in a rural community. Method: Participants were 131 predominantly older (77% 65+ years) Hispanic/Latinx adults (98%). A structured Spanish-language interview and pure-tone threshold test data were analyzed for each participant. The sensitivities and specificities of three single questions and the Hearing Handicap Index for the Elderly–Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry & Weinstein, 1983) in Spanish, as well as three audiometric screening criteria, were evaluated in relation to the pure-tone threshold test for detecting hearing loss. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1–4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, “¿Creeustedquetiene pérdida de audición? (Do you think you have a hearing loss?),” was shown to be the most sensitive self-report screening compared to other single-item questions and the HHIE-S. This single question was as sensitive as an audiometric screening to detect a moderate hearingloss(>40dBHLineitherear).Resultsfrom the Spanish HHIE-S indicated poor performance to detect hearing loss in this population, consistent with previous research. Conclusions: Among older Spanish-speaking adults, self-reported hearing status had varying sensitivities depending on the question asked. However, of the tools evaluated, the self-perception question proved to be a more sensitive and specific tool than a multi-item screen. Objective audiometric testing (> 25 dB HL) resulted in the highest sensitivity to detect a mild hearing loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081945560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081945560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053
DO - 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053
M3 - Article
C2 - 32073298
AN - SCOPUS:85081945560
SN - 1059-0889
VL - 29
SP - 35
EP - 49
JO - American journal of audiology
JF - American journal of audiology
IS - 1
ER -