Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. METHODS: On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. RESULTS: Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1282-1292 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health