Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Results of the MERCI trial

  • Wade S. Smith
  • , Gene Sung
  • , Sidney Starkman
  • , Jeffrey L. Saver
  • , Chelsea S. Kidwell
  • , Y. Pierre Gobin
  • , Helmi L. Lutsep
  • , Gary M. Nesbit
  • , Thomas Grobelny
  • , Marilyn M. Rymer
  • , Isaac E. Silverman
  • , Randall T. Higashida
  • , Ronald F. Budzik
  • , Michael P. Marks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Purpose - The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke is tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) given intravenously within 3 hours of symptom onset. An alternative strategy for opening intracranial vessels during stroke is mechanical embolectomy, especially for patients ineligible for intravenous tPA. Methods - We investigated the safety and efficacy of a novel embolectomy device (Merci Retriever) to open occluded intracranial large vessels within 8 hours of the onset of stroke symptoms in a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter trial. All patients were ineligible for intravenous tPA. Primary outcomes were recanalization and safety, and secondary outcomes were neurological outcome at 90 days in recanalized versus nonrecanalized patients. Results - Recanalization was achieved in 46% (69/151) of patients on intention to treat analysis, and in 48% (68/141) of patients in whom the device was deployed. This rate is significantly higher than that expected using an historical control of 18% (P<0.0001). Clinically significant procedural complications occurred in 10 of 141 (7.1%) patients. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages was observed in 11 of 141 (7.8%) patients. Good neurological outcomes (modified Rankin score ≤2) were more frequent at 90 days in patients with successful recanalization compared with patients with unsuccessful recanalization (46% versus 10%; relative risk [RR], 4.4; 95% CI, 2.1 to 9.3; P<0.0001), and mortality was less (32% versus 54%; RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01). Conclusions - A novel endovascular embolectomy device can significantly restore vascular patency during acute ischemic stroke within 8 hours of stroke symptom onset and provides an alternative intervention for patients who are otherwise ineligible for thrombolytics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1432-1438
Number of pages7
JournalStroke
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Embolectomy
  • Embolism
  • Ischemia
  • Reperfusion
  • Stroke, acute
  • Thrombectomy
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Results of the MERCI trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this