TY - JOUR
T1 - Safeguarding trust in a digital ecosystem
AU - Aguiar, Marcos
AU - Kiderman, Jeff
AU - Shekar, Harsha Chandra
AU - Schilke, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Marcos Aguiar, Jeff Kiderman, Harsha Chandra Shekar and Oliver Schilke.
PY - 2024/7/23
Y1 - 2024/7/23
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the significance of safeguards in digital ecosystems and their role in generating trust among participants. This paper argues that the right mix and number of safeguards are crucial for an ecosystem’s growth and success. It offers ecosystem orchestrators concrete guidelines for how to implement and monitor safeguards. Design/methodology/approach: This research is based on both consulting experience and publicly available information on several digital ecosystems. Findings: This research conceptualizes safeguards as precautionary mechanisms that mandate or promote desirable behavior in an effort to engender trust among ecosystem participants. Safeguards can take various forms, including passwords, escrow, user privacy controls, ratings and reviews and policies and contracts. Striking the right balance of safeguards – neither too few nor too many – is crucial for ecosystem orchestrators. This paper identifies the factors that determine the optimal mix of safeguards, including the power asymmetry between sellers and buyers, the sophistication of participants, the nature of transactions, the cost of negative outcomes and the cost-benefit tradeoff. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to illuminate the relationship between safeguards and trust in the context of digital ecosystem. It is also one of the few attempts to provide managerial guidance for ecosystem designers trying to structure their platform for trust.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the significance of safeguards in digital ecosystems and their role in generating trust among participants. This paper argues that the right mix and number of safeguards are crucial for an ecosystem’s growth and success. It offers ecosystem orchestrators concrete guidelines for how to implement and monitor safeguards. Design/methodology/approach: This research is based on both consulting experience and publicly available information on several digital ecosystems. Findings: This research conceptualizes safeguards as precautionary mechanisms that mandate or promote desirable behavior in an effort to engender trust among ecosystem participants. Safeguards can take various forms, including passwords, escrow, user privacy controls, ratings and reviews and policies and contracts. Striking the right balance of safeguards – neither too few nor too many – is crucial for ecosystem orchestrators. This paper identifies the factors that determine the optimal mix of safeguards, including the power asymmetry between sellers and buyers, the sophistication of participants, the nature of transactions, the cost of negative outcomes and the cost-benefit tradeoff. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to illuminate the relationship between safeguards and trust in the context of digital ecosystem. It is also one of the few attempts to provide managerial guidance for ecosystem designers trying to structure their platform for trust.
KW - Constraints
KW - Ecosystems
KW - Organizational design
KW - Safeguards
KW - Trust
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177083976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177083976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JBS-08-2023-0157
DO - 10.1108/JBS-08-2023-0157
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177083976
SN - 0275-6668
VL - 45
SP - 356
EP - 362
JO - Journal of Business Strategy
JF - Journal of Business Strategy
IS - 5
ER -