Sacred Obligations: Intercultural Justice and the Discourse of Treaty Rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


Today, Native Americans and Mexican American point to the treaties of the last century in support of their claims for intercultural justice. Under this discourse of treaty rights, both the Indian treaties and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo embody the moral obligation of the United States to honor its promises to respect the land and the cultural rights of the distinct ethnic groups that were involuntarily incorporated through conquest. However, there are also important differences between the group claims. In particular, the discourse of treaty rights for Native American people highlights the political sovereignty of those groups and maintains a powerful connection to contemporary concepts of self-determination and group sovereignty. Professor Tsosie argues that contemporary mechanisms for achieving intercultural justice must correspond to the unique historical and political qualities of the particular intergroup relations, and thus, the structures used to achieve intercultural justice for American Indian groups may well be different than those used for Mexican Americans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1615-1640
Number of pages26
JournalUCLA Law Review
Issue number6
StatePublished - Aug 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Sacred Obligations: Intercultural Justice and the Discourse of Treaty Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this