TY - JOUR
T1 - Rituals and right answers
T2 - barriers and supports to autonomous activity
AU - Wood, Marcy B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Student autonomy has been an important object of study for mathematics educators for many years. Over time, framings of autonomy have moved from a focus on the individual to considerations of how an individual’s autonomy is entangled in classroom-level interactions. What has been less closely studied is how classroom interactions provide uneven access to autonomy for individuals. This study uses a communicational perspective to clarify Piaget’s intellectual autonomy and examine students’ mathematical interactions. The findings describe barriers and supports to autonomous activity for three students. Students were prevented from engaging in autonomous activity when they were seen as less capable than others, when they felt the need to manage the activities of their peers, or when they focused on being seen as knowledgeable. In contrast, students acted with autonomy when they took up the teacher’s request for explanations, noticed a contrast between their answer and the right answer, and worked on making connections across different representations.
AB - Student autonomy has been an important object of study for mathematics educators for many years. Over time, framings of autonomy have moved from a focus on the individual to considerations of how an individual’s autonomy is entangled in classroom-level interactions. What has been less closely studied is how classroom interactions provide uneven access to autonomy for individuals. This study uses a communicational perspective to clarify Piaget’s intellectual autonomy and examine students’ mathematical interactions. The findings describe barriers and supports to autonomous activity for three students. Students were prevented from engaging in autonomous activity when they were seen as less capable than others, when they felt the need to manage the activities of their peers, or when they focused on being seen as knowledgeable. In contrast, students acted with autonomy when they took up the teacher’s request for explanations, noticed a contrast between their answer and the right answer, and worked on making connections across different representations.
KW - Autonomy
KW - Classroom interactions
KW - Communicational perspective
KW - Discourse
KW - Learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958044994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958044994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10649-015-9653-8
DO - 10.1007/s10649-015-9653-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958044994
SN - 0013-1954
VL - 91
SP - 327
EP - 348
JO - Educational Studies in Mathematics
JF - Educational Studies in Mathematics
IS - 3
ER -