TY - JOUR
T1 - “Rigorous and Systematic Qualitative Data Analysis in Biological Anthropology”
AU - Wutich, Amber
AU - Nelson, Robin
AU - DuBois, L. Zachary
AU - Astorino, Claudia M.
AU - Knudson, Kelly
AU - Reynolds, Austin W.
AU - Riley, Erin P.
AU - Smith, Rick W.A.
AU - VanSickle, Caroline
AU - Carroll, Stephanie Russo
AU - Connors, Ca'la K.
AU - Jankovic-Rankovic, Jelena
AU - Mitchell, Charlayne
AU - Roque, Anaís Delilah
AU - Tsosie, Krystal Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Biological anthropologists have long engaged in qualitative data analysis (QDA), though such work is not always foregrounded. In this article, we discuss the role of rigorous and systematic QDA in biological anthropology and consider how it can be understood and advanced. We first establish what kinds of qualitative data and analysis are used in biological anthropology. We then review the ways QDA has been used in six subfields of biological anthropology: primatology, human biology, paleoanthropology, dental and skeletal biology, bioarchaeology, and anthropological genetics. We follow that with an overview of how to use QDA methods: three simple QDA methods (i.e., word-based analysis, theme analysis, and coding) and three QDA approaches for model-building and model-testing (i.e., content analysis, semantic network analysis, and grounded theory). With this foundation in place, we discuss how QDA can support transformative research in biological anthropology—emphasizing the valuable role of QDA in inductive and community-based research. We discuss how QDA supports transformative research using mixed-methods research designs, participatory action research, and abolition and Black feminist research. Finally, we consider how to close a QDA project, reflecting on the logistics, ethics, and limitations of qualitative data sharing, including how researchers can use the CARE Principles (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics) to support Indigenous data sovereignty.
AB - Biological anthropologists have long engaged in qualitative data analysis (QDA), though such work is not always foregrounded. In this article, we discuss the role of rigorous and systematic QDA in biological anthropology and consider how it can be understood and advanced. We first establish what kinds of qualitative data and analysis are used in biological anthropology. We then review the ways QDA has been used in six subfields of biological anthropology: primatology, human biology, paleoanthropology, dental and skeletal biology, bioarchaeology, and anthropological genetics. We follow that with an overview of how to use QDA methods: three simple QDA methods (i.e., word-based analysis, theme analysis, and coding) and three QDA approaches for model-building and model-testing (i.e., content analysis, semantic network analysis, and grounded theory). With this foundation in place, we discuss how QDA can support transformative research in biological anthropology—emphasizing the valuable role of QDA in inductive and community-based research. We discuss how QDA supports transformative research using mixed-methods research designs, participatory action research, and abolition and Black feminist research. Finally, we consider how to close a QDA project, reflecting on the logistics, ethics, and limitations of qualitative data sharing, including how researchers can use the CARE Principles (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics) to support Indigenous data sovereignty.
KW - qualitative analysis
KW - qualitative data
KW - qualitative data sharing
KW - qualitative methods
KW - research methods
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000325322
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000325322#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.70008
DO - 10.1002/ajpa.70008
M3 - Article
C2 - 40071812
AN - SCOPUS:105000325322
SN - 0002-9483
VL - 186
JO - American Journal of Biological Anthropology
JF - American Journal of Biological Anthropology
IS - S78
M1 - e70008
ER -