TY - JOUR
T1 - Rhetoric, Narrative, and the Remembrance of Death in ʿAttār's Mosibat-nāmeh
AU - O’Malley, Austin Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Association For Iranian Studies, Inc.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - This paper examines the anecdotes of ʿAttār’s Mosibat-nāmeh as temporal phenomena from the perspective of a reader moving progressively through the text; it is argued that that these anecdotes do not function primarily as carriers of dogmatic information, but as dynamic rhetorical performances designed to prod their audiences into recommitting to a pious mode of life. First, the article shows how the poem’s frame-tale influences a reader’s experience of the embedded anecdotes by encouraging a sequential mode of consumption and contextualizing the work’s pedagogical aims. Next, it is demonstrated that these anecdotes are bound together through formulae and lexical triggers, producing a paratactic structure reminiscent of oral homiletics. Individual anecdotes aim to unsettle readers’ ossified religious understandings, and together they offer a flexible set of heuristics for pious living. Finally, it is argued that ʿAttār’s intended readers were likely familiar with the mystical principles that underlie his poems; he therefore did not use narratives to provide completely new teachings, but rather to persuade his audience to more fully embody those pious principles to which they were already committed.
AB - This paper examines the anecdotes of ʿAttār’s Mosibat-nāmeh as temporal phenomena from the perspective of a reader moving progressively through the text; it is argued that that these anecdotes do not function primarily as carriers of dogmatic information, but as dynamic rhetorical performances designed to prod their audiences into recommitting to a pious mode of life. First, the article shows how the poem’s frame-tale influences a reader’s experience of the embedded anecdotes by encouraging a sequential mode of consumption and contextualizing the work’s pedagogical aims. Next, it is demonstrated that these anecdotes are bound together through formulae and lexical triggers, producing a paratactic structure reminiscent of oral homiletics. Individual anecdotes aim to unsettle readers’ ossified religious understandings, and together they offer a flexible set of heuristics for pious living. Finally, it is argued that ʿAttār’s intended readers were likely familiar with the mystical principles that underlie his poems; he therefore did not use narratives to provide completely new teachings, but rather to persuade his audience to more fully embody those pious principles to which they were already committed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028549688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028549688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00210862.2017.1345302
DO - 10.1080/00210862.2017.1345302
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028549688
SN - 0021-0862
VL - 51
SP - 23
EP - 46
JO - Iranian Studies
JF - Iranian Studies
IS - 1
ER -