Abstract
Based on experiments in social evolution theory and game theory, this chapter argues two points: (a) the success of social groups depends on having punishers, and (b) punishers are supplying a public good, since those who cooperate but do not punish outperform those who cooperate and do punish. If we were simply forward-looking in our reasoning, as in the simple instrumental theory of rationality-if all payoffs are either current or anticipated, and not tied to past action-social cooperation would be a mystery. The chapter shows that for societies to thrive in the presence of noncooperative "free riders," it needs some members who are motivated to punish the free riders without instrumental justification-that is, as a matter of (evolved) sentiment or instinct rather than calculated, rational, utility-maximizing action. This, according to the chapter, accounts for both the existence of retributive "tastes" as well as their importance to social cooperation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Retributivism |
| Subtitle of host publication | Essays on Theory and Policy |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780199895342 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199752232 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2011 |
Keywords
- Cooperation
- Game theory
- Justice
- Punishment
- Rationality
- Retributivism
- Sentiment
- Social evolution
- Social theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences