Rethinking CME: An imperative for academic medicine and faculty development

David A. Davis, John Prescott, C. Michael Fordis, Stephen B. Greenberg, Charlene M. Dewey, Timothy Brigham, Steve A. Lieberman, Robin W. Rockhold, Susan J. Lieff, Thomas E. Tenner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations


To help address the clinical care gap, a working group discussed the future of faculty development in academic medicine, explored problems within the large, current enterprise devoted to continuing medical education (CME), and described four domains core to its revitalization and reformation. These domains are (1) preparing and supporting an engaged clinician-learner, (2) improving the quality of knowledge or evidence shared, (3) enhancing the means by which to disseminate and implement that knowledge and evidence, and (4) reforming the patient, health care, and regulatory systems in and for which the process of CME exists. Reshaping these domains requires the consideration of a more seamless, evidence-based, and patient-oriented continuum of medical education. Revitalizing CME also requires the full engagement of the academic medical community and its faculty. To achieve the goal of creating a new, more effective, seamless process of CME, the working group recommended an active faculty development process to develop strong clinician-learners, strong involvement of academic health center leaders, the development of an educational home for clinician-learners, and a meaningful national conversation on the subject of CME.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-473
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking CME: An imperative for academic medicine and faculty development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this