Responsiveness and robustness in the david lewis signaling game

Carl Brusse, Justin Bruner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We consider modifications to the standard David Lewis signaling game and relax a number of unrealistic implicit assumptions that are often built into the framework. In particular, we motivate and explore various asymmetries that exist between the sender and receiver roles.We find that endowing receivers with a more realistic set of responses significantly decreases the likelihood of signaling, while allowing for unequal selection pressure often has the opposite effect. We argue that the results of this article can also help make sense of a well-known evolutionary puzzle regarding the absence of an evolutionary arms race between sender and receiver in conflict-of-interest signaling games.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1068-1079
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responsiveness and robustness in the david lewis signaling game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this