Abstract
In the pages of this journal, Derk Pereboom and I have debated the soundness of his Four-Case Manipulation Argument for incompatibilism (Pereboom, 2008; McKenna, 2008). In this paper, I develop further my hard-line compatibilist reply to him. My reply takes a hard-line insofar as it involves resisting the attractive intuitive judgment that a radically manipulated agent is not free and morally responsible.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 467-484 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the Chin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS