Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the Chin

Michael Mckenna

doi:10.1111/phpr.12076

Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the Chin

Michael Mckenna

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the pages of this journal, Derk Pereboom and I have debated the soundness of his Four-Case Manipulation Argument for incompatibilism (Pereboom, 2008; McKenna, 2008). In this paper, I develop further my hard-line compatibilist reply to him. My reply takes a hard-line insofar as it involves resisting the attractive intuitive judgment that a radically manipulated agent is not free and morally responsible.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	467-484
Number of pages	18
Journal	Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Volume	89
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12076
State	Published - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1111/phpr.12076

Cite this

@article{1c36eea1d2f54d6d8278bc2ba8113add,

title = "Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the Chin",

abstract = "In the pages of this journal, Derk Pereboom and I have debated the soundness of his Four-Case Manipulation Argument for incompatibilism (Pereboom, 2008; McKenna, 2008). In this paper, I develop further my hard-line compatibilist reply to him. My reply takes a hard-line insofar as it involves resisting the attractive intuitive judgment that a radically manipulated agent is not free and morally responsible.",

author = "Michael Mckenna",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC.",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1111/phpr.12076",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "89",

pages = "467--484",

journal = "Philosophy and Phenomenological Research",

issn = "0031-8205",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resisting the manipulation argument

T2 - A hard-liner takes it on the Chin

AU - Mckenna, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In the pages of this journal, Derk Pereboom and I have debated the soundness of his Four-Case Manipulation Argument for incompatibilism (Pereboom, 2008; McKenna, 2008). In this paper, I develop further my hard-line compatibilist reply to him. My reply takes a hard-line insofar as it involves resisting the attractive intuitive judgment that a radically manipulated agent is not free and morally responsible.

AB - In the pages of this journal, Derk Pereboom and I have debated the soundness of his Four-Case Manipulation Argument for incompatibilism (Pereboom, 2008; McKenna, 2008). In this paper, I develop further my hard-line compatibilist reply to him. My reply takes a hard-line insofar as it involves resisting the attractive intuitive judgment that a radically manipulated agent is not free and morally responsible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908391473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908391473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phpr.12076

DO - 10.1111/phpr.12076

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908391473

SN - 0031-8205

VL - 89

SP - 467

EP - 484

JO - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

JF - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

IS - 2

ER -

Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the Chin

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this