Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit' - 'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified

Stuart Hameroff; Roger Penrose

doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014

Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit' - 'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified

Stuart Hameroff, Roger Penrose

Anesthesiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	104-112
Number of pages	9
Journal	Physics of Life Reviews
Volume	11
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014
State	Published - Mar 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Physics and Astronomy
Artificial Intelligence

Access to Document

10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014

Cite this

@article{b17fd96102ab4a538dab559bbf62f1e1,

title = "Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit' - 'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified",

author = "Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "104--112",

journal = "Physics of Life Reviews",

issn = "1571-0645",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit' - 'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified

AU - Hameroff, Stuart

AU - Penrose, Roger

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84895163171

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895163171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84895163171

SN - 1571-0645

VL - 11

SP - 104

EP - 112

JO - Physics of Life Reviews

JF - Physics of Life Reviews

IS - 1

ER -

Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit' - 'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this