Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]

A. J. Lotto

doi:10.1121/1.429431

Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]

A. J. Lotto

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a previous paper, Lotto et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648-3655 (1998)] claimed that experiments investigating a perceptual magnet effect (PME) failed to demonstrate a novel effect of goodness judgments on speech sound discrimination due to a confound in the procedure. New analyses of these data and a review of the recent literature fail once again to support the existence of PME. (C) 2000 Acoustical Society of America.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	3578-3580
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume	107
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429431
State	Published - 2000
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Access to Document

10.1121/1.429431

Cite this

@article{21c706b40f734b4983e4b4163b52e430,

title = "Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]",

abstract = "In a previous paper, Lotto et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648-3655 (1998)] claimed that experiments investigating a perceptual magnet effect (PME) failed to demonstrate a novel effect of goodness judgments on speech sound discrimination due to a confound in the procedure. New analyses of these data and a review of the recent literature fail once again to support the existence of PME. (C) 2000 Acoustical Society of America.",

author = "Lotto, \{A. J.\}",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1121/1.429431",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "107",

pages = "3578--3580",

journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",

issn = "0001-4966",

publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]

AU - Lotto, A. J.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In a previous paper, Lotto et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648-3655 (1998)] claimed that experiments investigating a perceptual magnet effect (PME) failed to demonstrate a novel effect of goodness judgments on speech sound discrimination due to a confound in the procedure. New analyses of these data and a review of the recent literature fail once again to support the existence of PME. (C) 2000 Acoustical Society of America.

AB - In a previous paper, Lotto et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648-3655 (1998)] claimed that experiments investigating a perceptual magnet effect (PME) failed to demonstrate a novel effect of goodness judgments on speech sound discrimination due to a confound in the procedure. New analyses of these data and a review of the recent literature fail once again to support the existence of PME. (C) 2000 Acoustical Society of America.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0034082073

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034082073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.429431

DO - 10.1121/1.429431

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034082073

SN - 0001-4966

VL - 107

SP - 3578

EP - 3580

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

IS - 6

ER -

Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this